The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2020.104715
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Associations of parental feeding practices and food reward responsiveness with adolescent stress-eating

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The following five subscales were examined: (i) responsibility , referring to the degree to which parents feel responsible for feeding their child, (ii) monitoring , assessing the degree to which parents report tracking their child's intake of unhealthy foods such as snacks, sweets, and high fat foods, (iii) restriction , assessing the degree to which parents feel responsible to restrict their child's consumption of unhealthy foods or limit access to certain foods, (iv) pressure to eat , meaning the degree to which parents encourage food intake in a particular way (e.g., eating more or eating more vegetables), and (v) concern , capturing the degree to which parents are concerned about their child's diet or weight. All items were reported on a 5‐point Likert scale with one indicating lower anchors such as “never,” “unconcerned,” or “disagree” and five indicating higher anchors such as “always,” “very concerned,” and “agree.” The CFQ has demonstrated sound psychometric properties (Kaur et al, 2006; Smith et al, 2020). In the current study, internal reliability ranged from α = 0.84 to 0.97.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The following five subscales were examined: (i) responsibility , referring to the degree to which parents feel responsible for feeding their child, (ii) monitoring , assessing the degree to which parents report tracking their child's intake of unhealthy foods such as snacks, sweets, and high fat foods, (iii) restriction , assessing the degree to which parents feel responsible to restrict their child's consumption of unhealthy foods or limit access to certain foods, (iv) pressure to eat , meaning the degree to which parents encourage food intake in a particular way (e.g., eating more or eating more vegetables), and (v) concern , capturing the degree to which parents are concerned about their child's diet or weight. All items were reported on a 5‐point Likert scale with one indicating lower anchors such as “never,” “unconcerned,” or “disagree” and five indicating higher anchors such as “always,” “very concerned,” and “agree.” The CFQ has demonstrated sound psychometric properties (Kaur et al, 2006; Smith et al, 2020). In the current study, internal reliability ranged from α = 0.84 to 0.97.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adolescent eating behaviors have the potential to impact the course of future mental health and metabolic health (Alberga et al, 2012; Neumark‐Sztainer et al, 2011; Tanofsky‐Kraff et al, 2012). Food parenting practices have been related to adolescents' disordered eating (Allen et al, 2014; Schmidt et al, 2019) and overeating behaviors associated with obesity and adverse metabolic health outcomes (Reina et al, 2013; Smith et al, 2020). Yet, this work primarily has been centered on parenting and parent‐reported food practices, as opposed to qualities of the interactions between parents and their adolescents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Orangtua yang memiliki motivasi rendah dalam mengkonsumsi makanan bergizi memberikan dampak terhadap kurangnya konsumsi makanan anak (Lim et al, 2020). Kepedulian orangtua terhadap berat badan anak menunjukkan hasil yang signifikan terhadap perilaku makan berlebih sebagai respon eating-stress (Smith et al, 2020). Produksi makanan olahan dan konsumsi makanan olahan dipengaruhi oleh peran ibu dalam penyediaannya (Sato et al, 2020).…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…Thus, it is proposed that the net effect of these stimulatory and inhibitory signals has a determining influence on eating behaviors like meal size and meal frequency [27]. The development of typical overeating behavior is rooted in the family environment and being internalized, stress-related alleviation-reward systems -are resistant to different nutritional and medical therapies [28] imposing the need for change in the parental attitudes and feeding environment of their child -generating engagement in overeating in response to stress eventually. The nutritional assistance/parenting programs of the families have to be strongly connected with the mandatory psychological assistance [29].…”
Section: Normal Weight Obesity a New Guy In Townmentioning
confidence: 99%