“…The following five subscales were examined: (i) responsibility , referring to the degree to which parents feel responsible for feeding their child, (ii) monitoring , assessing the degree to which parents report tracking their child's intake of unhealthy foods such as snacks, sweets, and high fat foods, (iii) restriction , assessing the degree to which parents feel responsible to restrict their child's consumption of unhealthy foods or limit access to certain foods, (iv) pressure to eat , meaning the degree to which parents encourage food intake in a particular way (e.g., eating more or eating more vegetables), and (v) concern , capturing the degree to which parents are concerned about their child's diet or weight. All items were reported on a 5‐point Likert scale with one indicating lower anchors such as “never,” “unconcerned,” or “disagree” and five indicating higher anchors such as “always,” “very concerned,” and “agree.” The CFQ has demonstrated sound psychometric properties (Kaur et al, 2006; Smith et al, 2020). In the current study, internal reliability ranged from α = 0.84 to 0.97.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adolescent eating behaviors have the potential to impact the course of future mental health and metabolic health (Alberga et al, 2012; Neumark‐Sztainer et al, 2011; Tanofsky‐Kraff et al, 2012). Food parenting practices have been related to adolescents' disordered eating (Allen et al, 2014; Schmidt et al, 2019) and overeating behaviors associated with obesity and adverse metabolic health outcomes (Reina et al, 2013; Smith et al, 2020). Yet, this work primarily has been centered on parenting and parent‐reported food practices, as opposed to qualities of the interactions between parents and their adolescents.…”
Adolescent disordered eating and obesity are interrelated and adversely relate to mental and metabolic health. Parental feeding practices have been associated with adolescent disordered eating and obesity. Yet, observable interactions related to food parenting have not been well characterized. To address this gap, N = 30 adolescents (M ± SD 14 ± 2 year) at risk for adult obesity due to above‐average body mass index (BMI ≥70th percentile) or parental obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m2) participated in a video‐recorded parent–adolescent task to discuss a food/eating‐related disagreement. Interactions were coded for individual/dyadic affect/content using the Interactional Dimensions Coding System. We examined associations of interaction qualities with parent‐reported food practices, adolescent disordered eating behaviors/attitudes, and insulin resistance. Reported parenting practices were correlated with multiple interaction qualities (p‐values <0.05), with the most consistent correspondence between parent‐reported pressure to eat (e.g., pressure to eat more healthy foods) and negative aspects of parent–adolescent interactions. Also, after accounting for adolescent age, sex, and BMI‐standard score, parent–adolescent interaction qualities were associated with adolescents' disordered eating and insulin resistance. Specifically, greater adolescent problem‐solving related to less adolescent global disordered eating, shape, and weight concern (p‐values <0.05); adolescent autonomy related to less weight concern (p = 0.03). Better parent communication skills were associated with less adolescent eating concern (p = 0.04), and observed dyadic mutuality related to adolescents' lower insulin resistance (p = 0.03). Parent–adolescent interaction qualities during food/eating‐related disagreements show associations with parent‐reported food practices and adolescent disordered eating. This method may offer a tool for measuring the qualities of parent–adolescent food/eating‐related interactions. A nuanced understanding of conversations about food/eating may inform family‐based intervention in youth at‐risk for adult obesity.
“…The following five subscales were examined: (i) responsibility , referring to the degree to which parents feel responsible for feeding their child, (ii) monitoring , assessing the degree to which parents report tracking their child's intake of unhealthy foods such as snacks, sweets, and high fat foods, (iii) restriction , assessing the degree to which parents feel responsible to restrict their child's consumption of unhealthy foods or limit access to certain foods, (iv) pressure to eat , meaning the degree to which parents encourage food intake in a particular way (e.g., eating more or eating more vegetables), and (v) concern , capturing the degree to which parents are concerned about their child's diet or weight. All items were reported on a 5‐point Likert scale with one indicating lower anchors such as “never,” “unconcerned,” or “disagree” and five indicating higher anchors such as “always,” “very concerned,” and “agree.” The CFQ has demonstrated sound psychometric properties (Kaur et al, 2006; Smith et al, 2020). In the current study, internal reliability ranged from α = 0.84 to 0.97.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adolescent eating behaviors have the potential to impact the course of future mental health and metabolic health (Alberga et al, 2012; Neumark‐Sztainer et al, 2011; Tanofsky‐Kraff et al, 2012). Food parenting practices have been related to adolescents' disordered eating (Allen et al, 2014; Schmidt et al, 2019) and overeating behaviors associated with obesity and adverse metabolic health outcomes (Reina et al, 2013; Smith et al, 2020). Yet, this work primarily has been centered on parenting and parent‐reported food practices, as opposed to qualities of the interactions between parents and their adolescents.…”
Adolescent disordered eating and obesity are interrelated and adversely relate to mental and metabolic health. Parental feeding practices have been associated with adolescent disordered eating and obesity. Yet, observable interactions related to food parenting have not been well characterized. To address this gap, N = 30 adolescents (M ± SD 14 ± 2 year) at risk for adult obesity due to above‐average body mass index (BMI ≥70th percentile) or parental obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m2) participated in a video‐recorded parent–adolescent task to discuss a food/eating‐related disagreement. Interactions were coded for individual/dyadic affect/content using the Interactional Dimensions Coding System. We examined associations of interaction qualities with parent‐reported food practices, adolescent disordered eating behaviors/attitudes, and insulin resistance. Reported parenting practices were correlated with multiple interaction qualities (p‐values <0.05), with the most consistent correspondence between parent‐reported pressure to eat (e.g., pressure to eat more healthy foods) and negative aspects of parent–adolescent interactions. Also, after accounting for adolescent age, sex, and BMI‐standard score, parent–adolescent interaction qualities were associated with adolescents' disordered eating and insulin resistance. Specifically, greater adolescent problem‐solving related to less adolescent global disordered eating, shape, and weight concern (p‐values <0.05); adolescent autonomy related to less weight concern (p = 0.03). Better parent communication skills were associated with less adolescent eating concern (p = 0.04), and observed dyadic mutuality related to adolescents' lower insulin resistance (p = 0.03). Parent–adolescent interaction qualities during food/eating‐related disagreements show associations with parent‐reported food practices and adolescent disordered eating. This method may offer a tool for measuring the qualities of parent–adolescent food/eating‐related interactions. A nuanced understanding of conversations about food/eating may inform family‐based intervention in youth at‐risk for adult obesity.
“…Orangtua yang memiliki motivasi rendah dalam mengkonsumsi makanan bergizi memberikan dampak terhadap kurangnya konsumsi makanan anak (Lim et al, 2020). Kepedulian orangtua terhadap berat badan anak menunjukkan hasil yang signifikan terhadap perilaku makan berlebih sebagai respon eating-stress (Smith et al, 2020). Produksi makanan olahan dan konsumsi makanan olahan dipengaruhi oleh peran ibu dalam penyediaannya (Sato et al, 2020).…”
Anak usia dini mengkonsumsi 1-2 jenis makanan dalam setiap porsi makan, 96 persen memilih makanan siap saji, 81.48 persen menyukai permen, coklat, gula-gula. Data tersebut menunjukkan rendahnya literasi gizi pada anak usia dini. Penelitian dilakukan untuk mengetahui berapa banyak anak usia dini yang terlibat dalam kegiatan penyajian makanan sebagai pengenalan literasi gizi. Metode survei digunakan dengan menyebar kuesioner pada 10 grup whatsapp para ibu yang memiliki anak usia 4-8 tahun di Pondok Kelapa, Jakarta Timur. Hasil penelitian Indikator membaca resep makanan sebesar 53,40 persen, indikator menulis resep makanan sebesar 83,10 persen, indikator menghitung jumlah bahan makanan sebesar 13,60 persen, berdiskusi tentang zat gizi dalam makanan sebesar 86,4 persen, indikator berdiskusi tentang resep kesukaan keluarga sebesar 74,6 persen, indikator membuat daftar belanja bahan makanan sebesar 53,4 perseb, indikator berbelanja bahan makanan sebesar 78,0 persen, indikator turut memasak sebesar 42,0 persen, indikator menyajikan makanan sebesar 57,6 persen. Anak usia dini dapat melakukan kegiatan penyajian makanan dengan bantuan Ibu sebagai bentuk pengenalan literasi gizi.
“…Thus, it is proposed that the net effect of these stimulatory and inhibitory signals has a determining influence on eating behaviors like meal size and meal frequency [27]. The development of typical overeating behavior is rooted in the family environment and being internalized, stress-related alleviation-reward systems -are resistant to different nutritional and medical therapies [28] imposing the need for change in the parental attitudes and feeding environment of their child -generating engagement in overeating in response to stress eventually. The nutritional assistance/parenting programs of the families have to be strongly connected with the mandatory psychological assistance [29].…”
Section: Normal Weight Obesity a New Guy In Townmentioning
The overweight and obesity, as well as their related noncommunicable diseases are preventable through lifestyle changes targeted in public health actions - but unfortunately with little or no success until now. In the present work we analysed the most important actual studies in the field - in order to provide and recommend updated strategies to target efficiently the public health objectives. We identified four main topics of high importance in the current approach towards obesity: (1) the increasing prevalence and multiple health consequences (2) current public health (PH) strategies for risk factor reduction and obesity prevention (3) the influence of the obesogenic environment on individual behavior (4) recent data on weight loss and weight loss maintenance programs. A new approach is needed towards the (1) causative factors; (2) public health measures addressed precise to the remarkable regional differences in obesity prevalence and trends drives from the ethio-patogenic factors and PH recommendations – most of them related to nutrition patterns and food quality – all together with lifestyle and environment measures.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.