2022
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19106209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Associations between Training Load and Well-Being in Elite Beach Soccer Players: A Case Report

Abstract: The current case study aimed to quantify within-subjects correlations between training load and well-being in elite male beach soccer players. Data were obtained over three consecutive days during the preparation camp for the FIFA Beach Soccer World Cup Russia 2021. The session rating of perceived exertion (s-RPE) and external training load metrics using global positioning system (GPS) were recorded. Eleven players reported perceived well-being (sleep quality, fatigue, muscle soreness and stress) using a Liker… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the remaining 32 studies, 12 did not fulfill the inclusion criteria after the revision of the full text due to: (a) specific evaluation tests ( n = 2), (b) match or training demands in non-invasion beach sports ( n = 11), (c) match or training demands in conventional sports (n= 2), (d) the notational analysis of matches ( n = 1), and (e) referees ( n = 1). Finally, 15 studies that evaluate the internal and external workload in beach invasion sports were included in this systematic review: (a) beach handball ( n = 10) [ 15 , 19 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 ] and (b) beach soccer ( n = 4) [ 14 , 21 , 36 , 37 ]. None of the studies assessed beach rugby.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…From the remaining 32 studies, 12 did not fulfill the inclusion criteria after the revision of the full text due to: (a) specific evaluation tests ( n = 2), (b) match or training demands in non-invasion beach sports ( n = 11), (c) match or training demands in conventional sports (n= 2), (d) the notational analysis of matches ( n = 1), and (e) referees ( n = 1). Finally, 15 studies that evaluate the internal and external workload in beach invasion sports were included in this systematic review: (a) beach handball ( n = 10) [ 15 , 19 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 ] and (b) beach soccer ( n = 4) [ 14 , 21 , 36 , 37 ]. None of the studies assessed beach rugby.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior to the quality assessment, an inter-coder reliability analysis was conducted, yielding a value of 0.95, indicating a high level of agreement between observers (95% confidence interval: 0.93 to 0.97). The principal findings of the quality indicators for the chosen studies were as follows: (1) all studies obtained a B score with an average methodological quality of 12.93/16 (80.83%); (2) one study attained 15/16 points [ 15 ]; (3) two studies obtained 14/16 points [ 14 , 30 ], (4) seven studies obtained 13/16 points [ 19 , 21 , 27 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 37 ], (4) five studies achieved 12/16 points [ 28 , 29 , 31 , 35 , 36 ], and (5) no study received a score below 12 points that correspond to the C score (insufficient methodological quality) (see Table 2 for more details).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Changes in the means of raw values as well as their 90% compatibility intervals were assessed in standardised units. For the within-subject change from NC to QSC, the mean change values were divided by the standard deviation (SD) in NC, while for the within-subject change from the 1st repetition or rest status to the 2nd to 10th repetitions or post-test status, the mean change values were divided by the SD in the 1st repetition or in the rest-status [42,43]. The magnitudes of the mean changes were then evaluated qualitatively using the following scale: < 0.2-trivial, 0.2-0.6-small, 0.6-1.2-moderate, 1.2-2.0-large, 2.0-4.0-very large, > 4.0-extremely large.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%