2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-4320(03)00098-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Associations between the manipulation of patterns of follicular development and fertility in cattle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0
10

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
2
31
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…The mechanisms for these effects was shown to be associated with the luteinization of ovarian follicles so that they could no longer produce estradiol with the consequential effect of preventing complete luteolysis by the injected PGF [7][8][9]. These effects were incorporated into the design of two field trials which showed that injecting 10 μg of the GnRH analogue buserelin from 8 to 10 days after insemination could significantly improve conception rates [10]; subsequent studies could not confirm this benefit [11].…”
Section: Gonadotropin Releasing Hormonementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanisms for these effects was shown to be associated with the luteinization of ovarian follicles so that they could no longer produce estradiol with the consequential effect of preventing complete luteolysis by the injected PGF [7][8][9]. These effects were incorporated into the design of two field trials which showed that injecting 10 μg of the GnRH analogue buserelin from 8 to 10 days after insemination could significantly improve conception rates [10]; subsequent studies could not confirm this benefit [11].…”
Section: Gonadotropin Releasing Hormonementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best time for initiation of the Ovsynch program is reportedly between days 5 and 12 of the estrous cycle (Vasconcelos et al 1999;Moreira et al 2000b). Asynchronous response (Vasconceles et al 1999), failure of complete luteal regression followed by PGF 2a (Burke et al 1996), and short estrous cycles (Macmillan et al 2003) may be the other reasons for low conception rate in cows subjected to Ovsynch. In previous work (Colazo et al 2009), we reported that 11% of cows ovulated before TAI, 15% did not respond to treatment with PGF and another 9% did not ovulate after the second treatment with GnRH, indicating that synchronization rate [defined as cows that had a regressed corpus luteum (CL) and ovulated within 24 h after TAI] was only 68% after Ovsynch.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some authors (Pursley et al 1997a, b;Ambrose et al 2003) have reported that P/AI to TAI after Ovsynch were comparable to that following insemination at detected estrus (IDE), others have reported lower P/AI (Tenhagen et al 2004a) and higher embryonic mortality rates (Macmillan et al 2003) following TAI compared with IDE. Factors such as the stage of lactation (Tenhagen et al 2003), season and high ambient temperature (De La Sota et al 1998;Al-Katanani et al 1999), body condition (Moreira et al 2000a), parity (Tenhagen et al 2004b;Balendran et al 2008), cyclicity status (Colazo et al 2013a) and stage of the estrous cycle during initiation of Ovsynch program (Vasconcelos et al 1999;Moreira et al 2000b) are also known to influence P/AI and pregnancy loss in dairy cattle.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study conducted by Ahmadzadeh, et al [11] a reduced dose of GnRH (gonadorelin) did not affect ovulation time relative to the second GnRH injection and did not compromise the incidence of ovulation and luteal development used in Ovsynch protocol. Buserelin is a more potent GnRH agonist than both gonadorelin and fertilerin in the bovine for FSH and LH release [12,13]. Therefore, it is generally used at 8-10 µg doses for synchronizing ovulation in the dairy cows [14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%