2001
DOI: 10.2466/pr0.2001.88.3c.1005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Associations between the Holden Psychological Screening Inventory and the Personality Assessment Screener in a Nonclinical Sample

Abstract: Associations between two screening inventories of psychopathology were investigated using a sample of 156 first-year undergraduates. Analyses supported the reliability and validity of all Holden Psychological Screening Inventory scales, but only of some of the Personality Assessment Screener scales. Orthogonal dimensions of Depression, General Distress, and Antisocial Tendencies represented the common latent structure of the two inventories.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Coefficient alphas were generally > .60, which is acceptable given that the element scales have two or three items each, and in fact impressive given that many of the strategies used to select PAS items were anticipated to diminish internal consistencies (Morey, 1997). These values were mostly consistent with those reported in previous studies (Holden et al, 2001;Morey, 2007). For example, the alphas ranged from .48 to .79 in the clinical standardization sample (Morey, 2007).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Coefficient alphas were generally > .60, which is acceptable given that the element scales have two or three items each, and in fact impressive given that many of the strategies used to select PAS items were anticipated to diminish internal consistencies (Morey, 1997). These values were mostly consistent with those reported in previous studies (Holden et al, 2001;Morey, 2007). For example, the alphas ranged from .48 to .79 in the clinical standardization sample (Morey, 2007).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Research that has been conducted beyond initial validation studies has focused on correlations with other clinical outcomes. For instance, available data suggest that the PAS total score significantly differentiates patients with and without schizophrenia (Christensen, Girard, Benjamin, & Vidailhet, 2006) and that PAS element scores significantly relate to attachment styles (D. P. Schmitt, 2005), dissociation (McLeod, Byrne, & Aitken, 2004), and scales of another screening instrument, the Holden Psychological Screening Inventory (Holden, Wasylkiw, Starzyk, Edwards, & Book, 2001). Research also suggests that the PAS total score is sensitive to therapeutic change in a brief treatment (Lapidus, Shinn, & Hutton, 2001) and predictive of outcomes following a medical procedure (Brotto, Basson, & Gehring, 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HPSI possesses construct validity (Holden et al, 1992) and reliability (Holden & Grigoriadis, 1995). The HPSI was also found to be reliable and valid within a non‐clinical sample of undergraduate students (Holden, Wasylkiw, Starzyk, Edwards, & Book, 2001).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Some researchers prefer a six-factor model (e.g., Hogan et al, 2007b;Douglas et al, 2000;Jackson, 1976;Ashton et al, 2000), whereas others have identified as few as three factors in a model (Eysenck, 1991;O'Gorman & Hattie 1986;Mckenzie, 1988). In addition, Holden et al (2006) produced a four-factor version.…”
Section: Criticism Of the Ffmmentioning
confidence: 99%