2019
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2018-14817
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Associations between on-farm animal welfare indicators and productivity and profitability on Canadian dairies: I. On freestall farms

Abstract: Motivating dairy producers to financially invest in the improvement of their animals' comfort and welfare can pose some challenges, especially when financial returns are uncertain. Economic advantages for dairy producers associated with increased animal welfare are likely to come from either a premium paid for the milk or increased productivity. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the associations between measures of herd productivity and farm profitability and animal-, management-, and resource-based… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Animal performance can also be indirectly influenced by management decisions that determine the conditions under which animals live (Adler et al 2019). The choice of environment for lactating dairy cows is therefore a key decision for dairy producers (Bewley et al 2017), especially because herd productivity and profitability may strictly depend on it (Villettaz Robichaud et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Animal performance can also be indirectly influenced by management decisions that determine the conditions under which animals live (Adler et al 2019). The choice of environment for lactating dairy cows is therefore a key decision for dairy producers (Bewley et al 2017), especially because herd productivity and profitability may strictly depend on it (Villettaz Robichaud et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Rowbotham and Ruegg (2015) found higher rates of milk production and improved udder health in sand-bedded freestall herds compared with herds using manure solids and other types of organic bedding over a mattress, a finding repeated in Danish freestall herds (Andreasen and Forkman, 2012). In both tiestall and freestall facilities, comfort indicators were associated with improved longevity in a Canadian survey: a lower proportion of cows in third or greater parity was associated with greater between-cow variability in lying time in tiestall herds (Villettaz Robichaud et al, 2019a), whereas in freestall herds, longer stall bed platforms were associated with the presence of a greater proportion of older cows, and culling rate was less in herds with a lower prevalence of lameness (Villettaz Robichaud et al, 2019b). Common to studies of high-performing dairy herds with lower rates of herd turnover is the control of lameness.…”
Section: Effect Of Abnormal Resting Behavior On Health and Longevitymentioning
confidence: 89%
“…It is more likely that high-producing dairy cows, who must spend more time eating and who may spend more time milking, have less available time for rest. That is not to say that higher lying times are not beneficial for improved milk production at the herd level, as was the case in a recent survey of 100 tiestall herds (Villettaz Robichaud et al, 2019a), although it is notable that the same group failed to find such an association in freestall herds that were similarly evaluated (Villettaz Robichaud et al, 2019b).…”
Section: Cow-related Factors Influencing Resting Behaviormentioning
confidence: 93%
“…On-farm welfare assessment is a good tool for providing such measures. In a recent Canadian study, good animal welfare, as quantified by the use of the Welfare Quality assessment protocol, was associated with improved productivity and longevity (Villettaz Robichaud et al, 2019). Beyond management and resource-based measures, animal-based welfare indicators bring important extensions to the welfare scoring of dairy herds (Hultgren, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%