Associations between clinical indicators of quality and aged-care residents’ needs and consumer and staff satisfaction: the first Australian study

Abstract

To ascertain Australian multistate prevalence and incidence of five commonly collected clinical indicators of aged-care home quality and to measure associations between these clinical indicators and levels of care needs and consumer and staff satisfaction. A retrospective analysis of national audit data collected from 426 facilities between 2015 and 2016 was performed. Regression models were used to examine associations between five clinical indicators (falls, pressure injury, physical restraint, unplanned weight loss and polypharmacy) and level of care needs measured by the Aged Care Funding Instrument (ACFI) and consumer and care staff survey responses. With the exception of polypharmacy, commonly collected negative clinical outcomes were rare events. Compared with care homes with <25% of residents having high-level care needs (high ACFI), homes with 25<75% high-ACFI residents had more occurrences of all negative clinical outcomes except pressure injury. Homes with ≥75% high-ACFI residents reported the highest rates of polypharmacy (odds ratio 1.48, 95% confidence interval 1.39 - 1.57). Falls, unplanned weight loss and pressure injury were inversely associated with satisfaction scores adjusted for residents' level of care needs. This first Australian study of multistate clinical indicator data suggests interpretation of clinical indicators of aged-care home quality requires consideration of the level of residents' care needs. Many Australian aged-care providers use quality indicators (QI) through benchmarking companies or in-house programs. The five most widely used aged-care clinical QIs in Australia are falls, pressure injury, physical restraint, unplanned weight loss and polypharmacy. Prevalence and incidence of these QIs are highly variable among Australian studies. A consistent message in the international literature is that residents' clinical characteristics influence QI outcomes at baseline and may continue to influence outcomes over time. Study of associations between Australian aged-care home characteristics and QI outcomes has been limited. This is the first Australian study of multistate clinical QI data. It is also the first to consider the level of resident care needs in the interpretation of clinical QI outcomes and exploration of the association between level of consumer and staff satisfaction and QI outcomes. Understanding the connections between aged-care home characteristics, consumer and staff perceptions and clinical QIs is crucial in the meaningful interpretation of QI outcomes in context. With the recent introduction of the National Aged Care Quality Indicator Program, it is timely to review national policy, to gauge current quality of care and the measure of care quality in the sector, and to develop directions for possible research to inform and resolve debates regarding the potential influence and unplanned effects that such a program may have.

Impact of the Stress Status of Employees on the Enterprise Technology Management Cost Through Matter-Element Analysis Under Psychological Health Education

“…The matterelement analysis was used to construct an evaluation model, to comprehensively evaluate the factors influencing the stress of enterprises and the factors influencing technology management cost in construction enterprises. It was found that among the six dimensions, the stress value of work characteristics was the highest, reaching 4.26 ± 0.511, which was in line with the results of suggested by Jeon et al (2019), indicating that there was much pressure on employees, due to the large workload and the tight deadlines of construction industry. In addition, the stress value of organizational structure and atmosphere ranked the second, reaching 4.15 ± 0.382, suggesting that there were always changes in the actual work, and the enterprise lacked democracy and fairness in decision-making.…”

Towards personalized care: Factors associated with the quality of life of residents with dementia in Australian rural aged care homes

“…As such, the provision of personalized dementia care in rural aged care homes has been receiving increasing attention, including how to plan and design care management, and how the quality of care is linked to the organizational characteristics [12,13]. The focus of the empirical literature on the evaluation of personalized care depends on clinical outcomes, which has been considered as an indicator for ensuring quality in care [16,17]. This attention to the clinical outcomes contributes to a lack of focus on the operational aspects of personalized care management that are of value to the RwD [17].…”

“…The focus of the empirical literature on the evaluation of personalized care depends on clinical outcomes, which has been considered as an indicator for ensuring quality in care [16,17]. This attention to the clinical outcomes contributes to a lack of focus on the operational aspects of personalized care management that are of value to the RwD [17]. For examples, lack of resources and support from organizations and colleagues have negative consequences on the care staffs' services.…”

The Essence of Care: Versatility as an Adaptive Response to Challenges in the Delivery of Quality Aged Care by Personal Care Attendants

“…Typical residents have higher levels of clinical acuity and frailty arising from complex medical needs including comorbid chronic conditions (Jeon et al, 2019), complicated by more than half of residents experiencing dementia and associated behaviors (Australian Productivity Commission, 2011). Residents are increasingly of multicultural backgrounds (Xiao et al, 2020), with predictions that by 2026, about one-quarter of aged care residents will be culturally and linguistically diverse (Gibson et al, 2001).…”