2019
DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.2295
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association of Work Measures and Specialty With Assigned Work Relative Value Units Among Surgeons

Abstract: IMPORTANCEThe primary data sources used to generate and update work relative value units (RVUs) are surveys of small groups of specialists who are asked to estimate the time and intensity needed to perform surgical procedures. Because these surveys are conducted by specialty societies and rely on subjective data, these sources have been challenged as potentially biased.OBJECTIVE To assess whether objective work measures are associated with a surgical procedure's assigned work RVUs and whether differences exist… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
78
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
78
1
Order By: Relevance
“…BMI cutoffs utilized are based on World Health Organization recommendations 21 . Work relative value units (RVUs) were dichotomized to highlight major surgery given association between this measure and operative time as well as morbidity 22 . The threshold value of 20 was chosen to identify major surgery that may not be described by anatomical classification.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BMI cutoffs utilized are based on World Health Organization recommendations 21 . Work relative value units (RVUs) were dichotomized to highlight major surgery given association between this measure and operative time as well as morbidity 22 . The threshold value of 20 was chosen to identify major surgery that may not be described by anatomical classification.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Childers et al called for more objective work measures to assign RVUs by utilizing NSQIP data of median operative time, postoperative LOS, rate of readmission, and rate of reoperation to create a valuation model. 1 Operative time and LOS were found to be stronger proxies of surgical complexity, yet there were many nuances in accurately capturing the intensity of a procedure. This study raised many questions regarding the need for more objective means to define RVUs, particularly given the availability of numerous national surgical databases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] As the fee-for-service health care model transitioned to a relative value scale in 1992, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services introduced a Resource-Based Relative Value Scale and the American Medical Association's Relative Value Update Committee (RUC) was developed. 1,[4][5][6][7] The RUC is composed of 31 members representing over 20 subspecialties who drive RVU determinations based primarily on survey data of physicians. Response rates to such surveys are typically low (median 2.2%), and thus, RUC decisions are often driven by the perspectives of a limited sample of providers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationship between estimated complexity, risk, and skill required of various procedures and the assigned wRVUs has been studied previously across a variety of specialties, revealing areas in which the system adequately estimates cost and others in which the system undervalues specific procedures 5–11 . Specifically, otolaryngology surgeries have been shown to have a greater proportion of procedures with lower than expected wRVUs when compared with other specialties 12 . As the demand for otolaryngology surgeries continues to rise, the need for proper consensus on adequate compensation for otolaryngologists is evident 13 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5][6][7][8][9][10][11] Specifically, otolaryngology surgeries have been shown to have a greater proportion of procedures with lower than expected wRVUs when compared with other specialties. 12 As the demand for otolaryngology surgeries continues to rise, the need for proper consensus on adequate compensation for otolaryngologists is evident. 13 A common perception among surgeons is that shorter procedures are more lucrative than longer ones due to inadequate wRVU scaling as operative time increases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%