Association of surgeon volume and hospital volume with the outcome of patients receiving definitive surgery for colorectal cancer: A nationwide population‐based study

Abstract

BACKGROUND:Patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) who undergo cancer surgeries with higher-volume providers may have better outcomes. The current debate focuses on whether it is hospital volume or surgeon volume that matters more. METHODS: The authors conducted a nationwide population-based study in Taiwan that enrolled all patients who underwent definitive surgery for newly diagnosed CRC between 2005 and 2011. All patients were divided into 4 quartiles according to hospital and surgeon volume. The main outcome was the 5-year mortality rate, which was analyzed using a frailty model for Cox regression. The authors also conducted fixed and random effects multivariate regression models to examine short-term outcomes and resource use, including operative mortality, hospital stay, emergency department visits within 30 days, and medical expenses. Analyses were adjusted for patient and provider characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 61,728 patients with CRC were included in the current study. The 5-year mortality rates were 38.7%, 32.8%, 32.0%, and 29.1% in descending order of hospital volume quartiles and were 41.4%, 34.1%, 29.8%, and 27.4% in descending order of surgeon volume quartiles. After adjustment for the individual and provider characteristics, surgeon volume, but not hospital volume, remained a significantly predictive factor of death (P<.001). In addition, those patients with CRC who underwent definitive surgeries performed by higher-volume surgeons had a relatively lower risk of operative mortality, shorter hospital length of stay, and lower medical expenses. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CRC who underwent definitive surgery performed by higher-volume providers were found to have better outcomes. Surgeon volume may play a more important role than hospital volume. Cancer 2015;121:2782-90.

Poor compliance with adjuvant chemotherapy use associated with poorer survival in patients with rectal cancer: An NCDB analysis

“…This is likely because the inclusion criteria for the current study were limited to those patients who had received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and therefore were more likely to have been treated at high‐volume centers. Nevertheless, the results of the current study add to the mounting literature of volume effects on guideline adherence and outcomes . Although the hospital‐level factors included in our model were associated with the increased administration of adjuvant therapy, they do not explain a large percentage of the hospital variation that was observed in the current model.…”

Association Between Treatment at a High-Volume Facility and Improved Survival for Radiation-Treated Men With High-Risk Prostate Cancer

“…Numerous studies have reported that hospital volume as well as surgeon volume are independent predictors of longterm outcomes in surgically treated cancer patients (1)(2)(3)(4)(5). This association was attributed to the hospital and surgeon's experience which yielded improved rates of achieving negative margins (6)(7)(8) and higher rates of dissecting involved lymph nodes (6,9,10).…”

Lymph Node Retrieval Rates in Melanoma: A Quality Assessment Parameter

“…Research into quality improvement in surgery has focused on the effect of surgeon and hospital volume on outcomes 15,16 . Spillane et al 6,8 demonstrated a higher lnrr for surgeons at the high-volume Sydney Melanoma Unit than for other Australian surgeons.…”