2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.genrep.2019.100477
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association of rs1800629 tumor necrosis factor alpha polymorphism with risk of prostate tumors of Iraqi patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, a current, updated meta-analysis with a comprehensive assessment that included more eligible studies was performed to evaluate the impact of TNF-α gene polymorphisms (rs1800629, rs361525 and rs1799724) on PCA susceptibility, which may overcome the aforementioned disadvantages [15,16,[19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36]. For the TNF-α rs1800629 polymorphism, the findings from 20 studies, including 6936 cases and 7619 controls, did not support an association between this variant and PCA risk [15,16,[19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36]. To the best of our knowledge, for the rs1799724 [15,16,35] polymorphism, which was analyzed for the first time, no significant association was detected from 3 studies, which included 2914 cases and 3121 controls.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, a current, updated meta-analysis with a comprehensive assessment that included more eligible studies was performed to evaluate the impact of TNF-α gene polymorphisms (rs1800629, rs361525 and rs1799724) on PCA susceptibility, which may overcome the aforementioned disadvantages [15,16,[19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36]. For the TNF-α rs1800629 polymorphism, the findings from 20 studies, including 6936 cases and 7619 controls, did not support an association between this variant and PCA risk [15,16,[19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36]. To the best of our knowledge, for the rs1799724 [15,16,35] polymorphism, which was analyzed for the first time, no significant association was detected from 3 studies, which included 2914 cases and 3121 controls.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ma et al, however, suggested that the rs361525 polymorphism was not associated with PCA, and the rs1800629 polymorphism, which is also the susceptible SNP for PCA, only had a significant association in healthy volunteers (AG vs. GG: OR = 1.47, 95% CI = 1.04-2.08) [18]. Due to these inconclusive results, as well as the publication of some additional studies, it was necessary to re-combine all of the articles, including 22 different case-control studies [15,16,[19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36], to conduct an updated meta-analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation