2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.06.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association of Rewarming Rate on Neonatal Outcomes in Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants with Hypothermia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Guidelines for the rate of rewarming the hypothermic VLBW/ELBW are lacking. 26 Gradual rewarming by 0.5C°/h was used throughout all periods as it is currently recommended for patients with both intended and unintended hypothermia to avoid complications such as shock, seizures, and arrhythmias. 2729 Thus, we chose a threshold of <20% incidence of admission hypothermia for the primary outcome measure to account for a potentially irreducible number of patients that would not achieve normothermia (if originally hypothermic) due to short transport times.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Guidelines for the rate of rewarming the hypothermic VLBW/ELBW are lacking. 26 Gradual rewarming by 0.5C°/h was used throughout all periods as it is currently recommended for patients with both intended and unintended hypothermia to avoid complications such as shock, seizures, and arrhythmias. 2729 Thus, we chose a threshold of <20% incidence of admission hypothermia for the primary outcome measure to account for a potentially irreducible number of patients that would not achieve normothermia (if originally hypothermic) due to short transport times.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2729 A faster rewarming rate (>0.5°C/h) has been suggested to have no increased risk in poor neonatal outcomes and may actually decrease the incidence of respiratory distress syndrome in the ELBW population. 26 Such a change may ameliorate the increased risk for morbidity and mortality that VLBW/ELBW neonates requiring interfacility transport have compared with their inborn cohorts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An EvUp (see Supplement Appendix C-10) identified 133 studies; of these, 2 were considered eligible for inclusion. Although the EvUp identified no new prospective trials of rates of rewarming, the 2 new retrospective studies 124,125 increased the number of infants in observational trials nearly 4-fold to 379 infants. Both studies found that the rate of rewarming (after adjustment for confounders) was not associated with the critical outcomes identified in each study.…”
Section: Rewarming Of Hypothermic Newborns (Nls 858: Evup)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ein aktueller ILCOR-Evidenzreview konnte zeigen, dass seit den vorherigen Leitlinien keine zusätzlichen systematischen Reviews oder RCT veröffentlicht wurden [ 1 ]. Zwei retrospektive Beobachtungsstudien mit 182 Patienten [ 341 ] und 98 Patienten [ 342 ] wurden identifiziert, die untersuchten, ob eine schnelle oder langsame Wiedererwärmung bei Neugeborenen mit Hypothermie (≤ 36 °C bei Aufnahme) das Outcome verändert. Nach Elimination von Störfaktoren zeigten die Ergebnisse beider Studien, dass die kritischen und relevanten Outcomeparameter durch die Geschwindigkeit der Wiedererwärmung nicht beeinflusst werden.…”
Section: Wissenschaftliche Grundlagen Auf Deren Basis Die Empfehlungen Für Die Praxis Zur Versorgung Und Reanimation Des Neugeborenen Berunclassified