2018
DOI: 10.1101/285924
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association of predicted deleterious single nucleotide polymorphisms with carcass traits in meat-type chickens

Abstract: Association of predicted deleterious single nucleotide polymorphisms with carcass traits 44 in meat-type chickens 45 46 Phone number: +55 19 3429 4434 54 55 ABSTRACT 56 57In previous studies, we used genome wide association (GWAS) to identify 58 quantitative trait loci (QTL) associated with weight and yield of abdominal fat, 59 drumstick, thigh and breast traits in chickens. However, this methodology assumes that 60 the studied variants are in linkage disequilibrium with the causal mutation and 61 consequently… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 41 publications
(9 reference statements)
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Likewise, Bhattacharya et al, () found that exons 2 and 4 of activin receptor 2A and activin receptors 2B were polymorphic and strongly associated with certain carcass traits in chicken population. Congruent with our findings, earlier studies reported significant association between single nucleotide polymorphisms and growth traits in innumerable genes among various chicken breeds (Bhattacharya, Chatterjee, Dange, & Bhanja, ; Li et al, ; Trevisoli et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Likewise, Bhattacharya et al, () found that exons 2 and 4 of activin receptor 2A and activin receptors 2B were polymorphic and strongly associated with certain carcass traits in chicken population. Congruent with our findings, earlier studies reported significant association between single nucleotide polymorphisms and growth traits in innumerable genes among various chicken breeds (Bhattacharya, Chatterjee, Dange, & Bhanja, ; Li et al, ; Trevisoli et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%