The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2010
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2010-01-266478
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association of Human Development Index with rates and outcomes of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for patients with acute leukemia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
31
1
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
31
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with our previous findings, we confirmed the importance of the socio-economic status, which effect was independent on the center experience. 3 To better understand the reasons why the outcome differed between centers with very low activity and the remainder, and in particular to check if the patients preselection could be the cause, we performed additional 'post-hoc' analysis comparing transplant characteristics in centers belonging to the 1st and 2nd-5th quintile according to the RIC-HSCT activity. With the cutoff point of 15 RIC-HSCT procedures in 7 years (that is, 2.1/year) established empirically based on results of a univariate analysis, we found that the interval from diagnosis to transplantation was significantly longer for centers with low activity (median 169 days, range 53-560) compared with the remainders (median 157 days, range 28-997; P ¼ 0.002), while the interval from diagnosis to CR1 was equal: 47 days (range 14-175) and 47 days (range 10-256), respectively (P ¼ 0.73).…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In line with our previous findings, we confirmed the importance of the socio-economic status, which effect was independent on the center experience. 3 To better understand the reasons why the outcome differed between centers with very low activity and the remainder, and in particular to check if the patients preselection could be the cause, we performed additional 'post-hoc' analysis comparing transplant characteristics in centers belonging to the 1st and 2nd-5th quintile according to the RIC-HSCT activity. With the cutoff point of 15 RIC-HSCT procedures in 7 years (that is, 2.1/year) established empirically based on results of a univariate analysis, we found that the interval from diagnosis to transplantation was significantly longer for centers with low activity (median 169 days, range 53-560) compared with the remainders (median 157 days, range 28-997; P ¼ 0.002), while the interval from diagnosis to CR1 was equal: 47 days (range 14-175) and 47 days (range 10-256), respectively (P ¼ 0.73).…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, even if all known risk factors are taken into account, transplant outcome remains highly variable, implying a role for other external factors such as the center experience, socio-economic status of a country or implementation of an international system accreditation of a transplant center. [1][2][3][4] The introduction of allo-HSCT with reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC-HSCT) has allowed application of transplantation procedures to patients with advanced age and significant comorbidities. [5][6][7][8] This option appears particularly important for diseases with prevalence in the elderly, like AML.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These factors are included in the prognostic scores elaborated by the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) [1]. However, results of alloHCT may also depend on external factors, such as the transplant team and, more widely, the country where the procedure was performed [2,3]. The significance of external factors is much less well characterized and is rarely considered for interpretation of clinical studies on alloHCT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent study, Giebel et al 16 demonstrated that transplantations performed in countries belonging to the upper human development index category were associated with higher LFS compared with the remaining ones (HR ¼ 1.36, P ¼ 0.008). Moreover, a recent survey revealed that HCT is used for a broad spectrum of indications worldwide, but most frequently in countries with higher gross national incomes, higher governmental health-care expenditures, and higher team densities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%