2012
DOI: 10.1038/bmt.2012.131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The impact of center experience on results of reduced intensity: allogeneic hematopoietic SCT for AML. An analysis from the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the EBMT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another strategy used to prevent AML relapse after alemtuzumab-based RIC has been based on the pre-emptive administration of azacitidine which can likely favor the GVT effect without excessive GVHD. 36,37 Besides the impact of in vivo T-cell depletion on outcomes, this study also confirmed the negative impact of poor risk cytogenetics, 23,38,39 of being transplanted with a female donor in case of male recipients, 40 and of being transplanted in low-activity centers 18,22 on OS and PFS, as previously observed by our group 18,22,38,41 and by other groups of investigators. 39,40 Further, in contrast to what was observed in a recent CIBMTR study, 39 current data suggest that older patient age at transplantation is associated with higher NRM translating to worse LFS and OS in multivariate analyses.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another strategy used to prevent AML relapse after alemtuzumab-based RIC has been based on the pre-emptive administration of azacitidine which can likely favor the GVT effect without excessive GVHD. 36,37 Besides the impact of in vivo T-cell depletion on outcomes, this study also confirmed the negative impact of poor risk cytogenetics, 23,38,39 of being transplanted with a female donor in case of male recipients, 40 and of being transplanted in low-activity centers 18,22 on OS and PFS, as previously observed by our group 18,22,38,41 and by other groups of investigators. 39,40 Further, in contrast to what was observed in a recent CIBMTR study, 39 current data suggest that older patient age at transplantation is associated with higher NRM translating to worse LFS and OS in multivariate analyses.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…We did not have complete data on the use of pre-emptive DLI in the registry but at least 15 (5%) control patients, 39 (14%) ATG patients and 66 (36%) alemtuzumab patients received pre-emptive DLI (defined as DLI given before/without AML relapse). Finally, there were a higher proportion of patients transplanted in low-activity centers 22 (arbitrarily defined as centers that contributed for p10 patients in the current study) among control patients (55%) than among ATG (43%) or alemtuzumab (44%) patients (Po0.001).…”
Section: Patients and Conditioningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current results are in accordance with a recent study from the CIBMTR analyzing data from 1676 patients given grafts after RIC as treatment for various hematological malignancies demonstrating that the use of alemtuzumab and/or ATG was associated with higher risk of relapse, that translated into worse disease-free survival. 30 Patients transplanted in high-activity centers had higher incidence of chronic GVHD and better outcomes owing to both lower relapse risk and lower NRM than those transplanted in lower-activity centers, as previously observed by Giebel et al 27 The higher incidence of chronic GVHD in patients transplanted in high-activity centers (even after adjusting for the use of ATG or alemtuzumab) could be due in part at a better recognition of signs of chronic GVHD in larger transplant centers, or to different modulation strategies of postgrafting immunosuppression according to disease risk and minimal residual disease data after transplantation in patients transplanted in high-activity centers (leading to both lower risk of relapse and higher incidence of chronic GVHD). Interestingly, NRM in patients diagnosed with extensive chronic GVHD was similar in patients transplanted in centers with high or low activity, stressing that treatment of extensive chronic GVHD has remained a difficult challenge even in large transplant centers.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Associations of patient and graft characteristics with other outcomes (chronic GVHD, relapse, NRM, LFS and OS) were evaluated in multivariable analyses, using Cox proportional hazards. Factors included in the models for acute and chronic GVHD included donor type, patient age 456 years, female donor to male recipient versus other gender combinations, donor and recipient cytomegalovirus serostatus, disease status at the time of transplant, cytogenetic risk group, TBI-versus chemotherapy-based RIC, the use of antithymocyte globulin (ATG) in the conditioning, the use of alemtuzumab in the conditioning, center activity 27 (arbitrarily defined as center that performed por X20 first allo-SCT with RIC conditioning as treatment for AML between 2000 and 2009) and prior grade II-IV acute GVHD (for chronic GVHD). The same factors as well as acute, limited chronic and extensive chronic GVHD were included in the models for NRM, relapse, LFS and OS ( Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Superior leukemia-free survival (LFS) after myeloablative alloHCT for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) was observed in countries with very high HDI values. On the other hand, individual center activity and organization also strongly influence the results of alloHCT [5][6][7][8]. In particular, increased nonrelapse mortality (NRM) after alloHCT with reduced-intensity conditioning was observed in centers with very little experience [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%