The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2008
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604276
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association of colorectal adenoma with other malignancies in Swedish families

Abstract: Using the Swedish Family-Cancer Database covering over 11.5 million individuals, estimated relative risks (RRs) for colorectal adenoma were using Poisson's regression. The RR of colorectal adenoma was found to be increased among first-degree relatives of patients with colorectal cancer (2.72; 95% confidence interval ¼ 2.46 -3.00) and among the offspring and siblings of patients with endometrial and prostate cancers. We also found an increased risk of colorectal adenoma for the offspring of individuals with sto… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of registry based data restricted our ability to quantify the independent effects of several additional risk factors given the Queensland Cancer Registry does not record information on receipt and completion of systemic therapies [16], genetic conditions [30], microsatellite instability [31], family history [47], lifestyle [32,48], environmental exposures [49], and surveillance intensity [50]. In particular, we lacked information to determine what effect, if any, radiation treatment for the first cancer had on the risk of subsequent cancers.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The use of registry based data restricted our ability to quantify the independent effects of several additional risk factors given the Queensland Cancer Registry does not record information on receipt and completion of systemic therapies [16], genetic conditions [30], microsatellite instability [31], family history [47], lifestyle [32,48], environmental exposures [49], and surveillance intensity [50]. In particular, we lacked information to determine what effect, if any, radiation treatment for the first cancer had on the risk of subsequent cancers.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, previous GWA studies mainly focused on patients with CRC, and it is not known whether the functional variants tagged by these SNPs act through increasing the risk of adenomas, carcinomas, or both. The familial risk of colorectal adenomas is estimated as similar to that of CRCs (Hiripi et al 2008), suggesting that some of the common genetic predisposition to CRC may be mediated through increased adenoma risk. Indeed, adenomas can be regarded as an intermediate phenotype between SNP and cancer (Carvajal-Carmona 2010), and under some plausible scenarios CRC predisposition polymorphisms might be associated more strongly with the risk of colorectal adenoma(s) than with CRC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, all these studies have focused on patients with CRC, and it is not known whether the functional variants tagged by these SNPs act through increasing the risk of adenomas, carcinomas or both. The familial risk of colorectal adenomas is estimated as similar to that of CRCs 9 , suggesting that some of the common genetic predisposition to CRC may be mediated through increased adenoma risk. Indeed, adenomas can be regarded as an intermediate phenotype between SNP and cancer 10 , and under some plausible scenarios, CRC predisposition polymorphisms might be more strongly associated with the risk of colorectal adenoma(s) than with CRC.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%