2018
DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.2151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association of Brain Reward Learning Response With Harm Avoidance, Weight Gain, and Hypothalamic Effective Connectivity in Adolescent Anorexia Nervosa

Abstract: Key PointsQuestionHow does brain response in participants with adolescent anorexia nervosa (AN) compare with healthy controls during taste reward conditioning?FindingsIn this cross-sectional multimodal brain imaging study of 56 female adolescents and young adults with AN and 52 matched controls, the AN group showed hyperactivation in the caudate head, nucleus accumbens, and insula compared with controls during a classical conditioning paradigm that has been associated with dopamine function. Orbitofrontal brai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

11
93
1
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
11
93
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The fMRI studies employed varied approaches and paradigms to investigate the processing of taste‐related stimuli. Seven fMRI studies compared neural response for pure taste solutions (i.e., carriers of basic tastes that have no smell properties) versus neutral stimuli (see Frank et al, , ; Frank, Collier, Shott, & O'Reilly, ; Frank, Shott, Keffler, & Cornier, ; Monteleone et al, ; Olsavsky et al, ; Wagner et al, ). Three fMRI studies compared neural response for caloric and noncaloric taste stimuli (see Oberndorfer et al, ; Radeloff et al, ; Wagner et al, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The fMRI studies employed varied approaches and paradigms to investigate the processing of taste‐related stimuli. Seven fMRI studies compared neural response for pure taste solutions (i.e., carriers of basic tastes that have no smell properties) versus neutral stimuli (see Frank et al, , ; Frank, Collier, Shott, & O'Reilly, ; Frank, Shott, Keffler, & Cornier, ; Monteleone et al, ; Olsavsky et al, ; Wagner et al, ). Three fMRI studies compared neural response for caloric and noncaloric taste stimuli (see Oberndorfer et al, ; Radeloff et al, ; Wagner et al, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three fMRI studies compared neural response for caloric and noncaloric taste stimuli (see Oberndorfer et al, ; Radeloff et al, ; Wagner et al, ). Seven studies used both taste and visual stimuli (see Cowdrey, Park, Harmer, & McCabe, ; Frank, Collier, Shott, & O'Reilly ; Frank, Shott, Keffler, & Cornier, ; Frank et al, , ; Frank, Shott, Rieder, & Pryor, ; Olsavsky et al, ). Three studies addressed the issue of hypothalamic functioning in response to taste stimuli (see Frank, Shott, Rieder, & Pryor, ; Frank et al, ; Van Opstal et al, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If encoding of this prediction error is essential to new learning, engagement in any alternative cognitive activity, including RNT, during the offset of the aversive cue could interfere with this process. Consistent with this possibility, recent neuroimaging work supports altered prediction error signaling in AN (Frank et al, 2018). Engagement in RNT during aversive experiences could also decrease working memory capacity and thus interrupt the update of corrective information necessary to shift expectancies and predictions (O'Reilly & Frank, 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…For instance, RNT may function as a form of cognitive avoidance (Ehring & Watkins, 2008). Consistent with this possibility, recent neuroimaging work supports altered prediction error signaling in AN (Frank et al, 2018). Temporary avoidance of negative affect via RNT during an aversive experience also could be negatively reinforcing, thus maintaining beliefs about these affective states as harmful and intolerable.…”
mentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation