2013
DOI: 10.1080/19320248.2013.816993
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association Between the Retail Food Environment, Neighborhood Deprivation, and County-Level Dietary Outcomes Among Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program–Education (SNAP-Ed) Recipients in Kentucky, 2010–2011

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, Dun & Bradstreet is the only data source that provides comparable data across the U.S. and historically to 1992, so combining multiple data sources [ 70 ] was not possible. In the absence of high quality empirical data quantifying error in commercial resource databases historically and across diverse metropolitan areas, we did not apply a correction factor as performed in previous neighborhood studies [ 72 ]. Parcel-level data needed to measure land use mix [ 6 8 ], an important aspect of walkability, were not collected for this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, Dun & Bradstreet is the only data source that provides comparable data across the U.S. and historically to 1992, so combining multiple data sources [ 70 ] was not possible. In the absence of high quality empirical data quantifying error in commercial resource databases historically and across diverse metropolitan areas, we did not apply a correction factor as performed in previous neighborhood studies [ 72 ]. Parcel-level data needed to measure land use mix [ 6 8 ], an important aspect of walkability, were not collected for this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Improving dietary intake among rural and lower-income populations is a national priority. At the individual level of dietary intake, a host of proximal and distal factors influence purchasing habits and thus what is consumed [ 1 , 2 , 3 ]. Specifically, among lower-income and rural communities, there is strong evidence to suggest that these neighborhoods often lack access to supercenters which constrains residents’ purchasing ability of affordable healthier food items [ 4 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 Gustafson et al reported that shopping at supermarkets was associated with a higher SSB consumption. 48 Many studies have examined the association between fruit and vegetable intake and the community food environment, and the results are generally consistent-those who live near supermarkets, farmer's markets, or healthy food stores consume more 20,21,23,28,49 while those who live near convenience stores and restaurants consume less. 17,49,50 These findings align with the current study's result that SNAP participation was associated with a lower frequency of fruit consumption when respondents did not live near a supermarket.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…27 A similar study examined the association of food outlets with macronutrient intakes among SNAP participants and reported SNAP participants had a higher consumption of calories and fat when living in counties with multiple gas stations with food marts compared to participants without access to multiple gas stations. 28 While these studies limited their population to SNAP participants, they did not examine whether these behaviors were different for income-eligible non-participants. SNAP participation increases a household's food budget, 29,30 and thus SNAP participants may purchase and consume different foods than the low-income, non-participating population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%