2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-7254.2007.00489.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association between SNP and haplotypes in PPARGC1 and adiponectin genes and bone mineral density in Chinese nuclear families

Abstract: Aim: To assess the contribution of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) and haplotypes in the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ co-activator-1 (PPARGC1) and adiponectin genes to normal bone mineral density (BMD) variation in healthy Chinese women and men. Methods: We performed populationbased (ANOVA) and family-based (quantitative trait locus transmission disequilibrium test) association studies of PPARGC1 and adiponectin genes. SNP in the 2 genes were genotyped. BMD was measured using dual-energy … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We excluded 15 individuals whose DNA could not be amplified to discriminate genotype due to its poor quality, and 6 daughters who deviated from Mendelian inheritance. As previously reported, we ultimately acquired 401 integrated female-offspring nuclear families comprising 1260 individuals [7,[16][17][18] . The average family size was 3.14; 348 families had one child, 50 families had two children, 2 families had three children, and 1 family had four children.…”
Section: Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We excluded 15 individuals whose DNA could not be amplified to discriminate genotype due to its poor quality, and 6 daughters who deviated from Mendelian inheritance. As previously reported, we ultimately acquired 401 integrated female-offspring nuclear families comprising 1260 individuals [7,[16][17][18] . The average family size was 3.14; 348 families had one child, 50 families had two children, 2 families had three children, and 1 family had four children.…”
Section: Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Until now, no study has reported an association between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the HOXD4 gene and BMD in humans. The majority of the association studies between genotypes and BMD have been performed in women [7,[16][17][18][19][20] . Therefore, we recruited two cohorts of nuclear families where one cohort contained only male offspring and the other cohort contained only female offspring.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coefficient of variability (CV) values were obtained from 15 volunteers with 3 measurements each. The respective CV values for the BMD of the lumbar spine 1-4, total hip, femoral neck, and trochanter were 1.39%, 0.70%, 2.22%, and 1.41% [1,[13][14][15] . The respective CV values for the fat mass measurements at the upper limbs, lower limbs, trunk, and total body were 7.58%, 3.28%, 2.52%, and 3.72%; the CV values for the lean mass at these sites were 1.18%, 1.59%, 1.12%, and 1.18%, respectively [15] .…”
Section: Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Our sample size in this study is in line with the sample size of the female-offspring nuclear families in our previous study. The latter has more than 80% power to test a candidate gene as a quantitative trait loci (QTL) and can explain about 10% of the bone phenotype variation [1,13,18,19] . Using the female-offspring nuclear families, we not only detected an association between Myostatin polymorphisms and BMD variation, but we also successfully observed that genetic polymorphisms in estrogen receptor α and collagen1α2 likely influenced the attainment of peak BMD in Chinese females [1,18,20] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, raw obesity phenotypic measurements, such as BMI, TFM, tFM, AFM, LFM, and percentage of fat mass (PFM), which are covariates, were adjusted by age. Because false-positive results can confound conclusions, the reliability of our results was assessed by performing a permutation procedure (1000 simulations) to generate empirical P values [22,23] . The statistical power was estimated with Piface (version 1.65) (http://www.math.uiowa.edu/~rlenth/ Power/) taking into account the sample size, minor allele frequency of every genotype and variation in obesity phenotypes.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%