2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2009.11.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association between Novelty Seeking of opiate-dependent patients and the catechol-O-methyltransferase Val158Met polymorphism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
25
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
6
25
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In support of previous research, Met 158 homozygous allele carriers show higher novelty seeking scores compared to Val 158 allele carriers [12,13,22]. However this has not been shown in ultra-endurance athletes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In support of previous research, Met 158 homozygous allele carriers show higher novelty seeking scores compared to Val 158 allele carriers [12,13,22]. However this has not been shown in ultra-endurance athletes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Met 158 homozygous allele carriers with greater phasic dopamine neurotransmission [1] would be expected to score higher on novelty seeking (NS). This has been well-supported in the literature among different populations including: Russian women [22]; bipolar patients [12]; methylphenidate dependent patients [27]; and heroin dependent patients [13]. However, it is not known whether a similar relationship between novelty seeking and the COMT polymorphism exists in an ultra-endurance population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Traits such as harm avoidance (HA) in TCI, neuroticism in NEO, and BIS all belong to negative emotionality (NEM), whereas novelty seeking (NS) in TCI, extraversion in NEO, and BAS belong to positive emotionality (PEM; Reuter et al, 2006b). Associations between COMT Val/Met and PEM/NEM were quite mixed, with nine studies showing no significant associations (Strobel et al, 2003;Tochigi et al, 2006;Ishii et al, 2007;Light et al, 2007;Urata et al, 2007;Sheldrick et al, 2008;Calati et al, 2011;Kang et al, 2010;Salo et al, 2010), seven studies showing the Val allele associated with high PEM or low NEM (Enoch et al, 2003;Tsai et al, 2004;Reuter and Hennig, 2005;Stein et al, 2005;Hoth et al, 2006;Hashimoto et al, 2007;Wacker and Gatt, 2010), and three studies showing the opposite (Met allele associated with high PEM or low NEM; Kim et al, 2006;Golimbet et al, 2007;Demetrovics et al, 2010), and three studies reported opposite pattern for males and females (Eley et al, 2003;Reuter et al, 2006b;Lang et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strong evidence emerged from existing studies that the polymorphisms in DRD4, DRD2 and 5-HTTLPR were not connected to novelty-seeking personality (Burt, McGue, Iacono, Comings, & MacMurray, 2002;de Brettes et al, 1998;Ebstein, 2006;Ebstein et al, 1997;Hill, Zezza, Wipprecht, Locke, & Neiswanger, 1999;Kluger, Siegfried, & Ebstein, 2002;Kreek, Nielsen, Butelman, & LaForge, 2005; S. H. Lee, Ham, Cho, Lee, & Shim, 2007;Light et al, 2007;Munafò et al, 2003;Ricketts et al, 1998;Samochowiec et al, 2001;Schinka, Letsch, & Crawford, 2002;Suzuki et al, 2008;Tsuchimine et al, 2012;Van Gestel et al, 2002). In contrast, studies on COMT polymorphism revealed mixed and conflicting results (Calati et al, 2011;Demetrovics et al, 2010;Golimbet, Alfimova, Gritsenko, & Ebstein, 2007;Hashimoto et al, 2007;Hosák, Libiger, Cizek, Beránek, & Cermáková, 2006;Hoth et al, 2006;Kim, Kim, Kim, Lee, & Kim, 2006;Lichtenberg, Bachner-Melman, Ebstein, & Crawford, 2004;Light et al, 2007;Reuter & Hennig, 2005; S.-J. Tsai, Hong, Yu, & Chen, 2004).…”
Section: Novelty-seekingmentioning
confidence: 99%