2018
DOI: 10.1080/10749357.2018.1503458
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association between incongruence about survivor function and outcomes among stroke survivors and family caregivers

Abstract: Findings from this study suggest that survivors and caregivers often have incongruent appraisals of survivor function, that incongruence does not improve naturally over time, and that incongruence may be detrimental for survivor and caregiver outcomes. Further research should be directed at the mitigation of incongruence and strategies to improve outcomes for both survivors and family caregivers.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Research is increasingly focusing on the relational aspects of recovery after stroke including the extent to which dyad members are congruent (or incongruent) in their appraisal of symptoms, how they communicate about their experiences and needs, and how they engage together in behaviors that promote physical and emotional health (Lyons & Lee, 2018; McCarthy et al, 2018; McCarthy & Lyons, 2015; Pucciarelli et al, 2017; Ramazanu et al, 2020). Relationship functioning itself has been strongly linked to depressive symptoms in both members of the dyad, with survivors and caregivers who report a strong relationship with their partner reporting fewer depressive symptoms (Epstein-Lubow et al, 2009; King et al, 2001; King et al, 2010; McCarthy et al, 2012; McPherson et al, 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research is increasingly focusing on the relational aspects of recovery after stroke including the extent to which dyad members are congruent (or incongruent) in their appraisal of symptoms, how they communicate about their experiences and needs, and how they engage together in behaviors that promote physical and emotional health (Lyons & Lee, 2018; McCarthy et al, 2018; McCarthy & Lyons, 2015; Pucciarelli et al, 2017; Ramazanu et al, 2020). Relationship functioning itself has been strongly linked to depressive symptoms in both members of the dyad, with survivors and caregivers who report a strong relationship with their partner reporting fewer depressive symptoms (Epstein-Lubow et al, 2009; King et al, 2001; King et al, 2010; McCarthy et al, 2012; McPherson et al, 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, an increasing number of researchers are starting to pay attention to caregivers’ health related to the burden of their profession (Majestic & Eddington, 2019). Moreover, caregivers’ influence on patients’ outcomes has been gradually explored (Kootker et al, 2019; McCarthy, Bakas, Schellinger, Stapleton, & Kissela, 2019). Lastly, inventions for caregivers or patient–caregiver dyads have been attempted in recent years (Marcotte, Tremblay, Turcotte, & Michaud, 2019; Mosher et al., 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies of stroke couples have already focused on the incongruence between stroke survivors' and spouse' appraisal of the illness, especially in survivors' memory and thinking function (McCarthy, Bakas, Schellinger, Stapleton, & Kissela, 2018; McCarthy & Lyons, 2015; Witty, Heffernan, & Riby, 2017). Qualitative research shows that spouses tend to overestimate the severity of the patient's illness, thereby overprotective patients away from some activity, which may cause the survivors feel be belittled (McCarthy & Lyons, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Qualitative research shows that spouses tend to overestimate the severity of the patient's illness, thereby overprotective patients away from some activity, which may cause the survivors feel be belittled (McCarthy & Lyons, 2015). It is examined that such incongruence between stroke couples is associated with the poor mental health of spouses (McCarthy et al, 2018). Nevertheless, how incongruence of dyadic appraisal works on dyadic mental health is unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%