2016
DOI: 10.1109/jsen.2016.2546241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association Between Imaging and XRF Sensing: A Machine Learning Approach to Discover Mineralogy in Abandoned Mine Voids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Classification tasks can be, for instance, determining the type of minerals [73,77,94,95], texture [66,89], or rock [86,93], class of mineral face [86], class of hematite crystals [78], distinguishing between quartz and resin in optical microscopy images [80], presence or absence of specific minerals in a sample [96], zeolite type [97], material fingerprints [98], class of regolith landform [99], and class of carbonates [100] based on a set of measurements or known features about a material. On the other hand, in regression problems, the goal is to estimate a continuous numerical value, for instance, prediction of concentrate yield and modal mineralogy [79] and estimation of drill-core mineral abundance [63], mineral density of elements [101], and calculation of amphibole formula [76].…”
Section: The ML Methods Leveraged In the Selected Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Classification tasks can be, for instance, determining the type of minerals [73,77,94,95], texture [66,89], or rock [86,93], class of mineral face [86], class of hematite crystals [78], distinguishing between quartz and resin in optical microscopy images [80], presence or absence of specific minerals in a sample [96], zeolite type [97], material fingerprints [98], class of regolith landform [99], and class of carbonates [100] based on a set of measurements or known features about a material. On the other hand, in regression problems, the goal is to estimate a continuous numerical value, for instance, prediction of concentrate yield and modal mineralogy [79] and estimation of drill-core mineral abundance [63], mineral density of elements [101], and calculation of amphibole formula [76].…”
Section: The ML Methods Leveraged In the Selected Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…OTVCA [65] RF [63]; SVM [63]; [65]; FF-ANN [63] Estimating the mineralogical compositions Elemental data acquired using X-ray fluorescence (XRF) instruments -ANN [84] Finding association between imaging and XRF sensing Images of rock samples -LR [101]; SVM [101] Generating 2D mineral map of chromite samples Optical micrograph images -RF [90] Geochemical anomaly detection; prospectivity for future exploration Geochemical exploration data; concentration of major and trace elements Feature elimination with cross-validation based on random forest [47]; unsupervised deep belief networks (DBNs) [54]; MMML [55]; hierarchical clustering [56]; SDAE [56]; PCA [56] VAE [45]; RF [47]; CNN [51]; SVM [54]; ACE [55]; IF [56] Litho geochemistry of sandstones obtained from drill cores PCA [82] LDA [82]; RF [82] Geochemical assay (ppm Cu); total magnetic intensity; isostaticresidual gravity -SVM [52] Spatial proxies -ANN [58]; RF [58] Table 3. Cont.…”
Section: General Trends and Research Gaps In The Application Of ML In The Selected Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Geological mapping [22][23][24] studies were conducted using the characteristics of rocks. A mineral analysis [25][26][27][28][29][30][31] was conducted using drilling data or samples. A mineral prospectivity modeling and mapping [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42] study was performed to evaluate the potential of minerals using the exploration data.…”
Section: Publication Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…2) K-nearest neighbor algorithm The KNN algorithm is more intuitive. For a sample in the set to be predicted, calculate the distance from all the samples to this sample in the training set, sort according to the distance, select the closest sample points, and determine the label of the prediction sample according to the number of votes in the category [21][22]. Compared with other machine learning algorithms, the under neighbor algorithm has no explicit modeling process and is a kind of "inert learning".…”
Section: Machine Learning Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%