2014
DOI: 10.1017/s0007114513004364
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association between dietary carbohydrate intake quality and micronutrient intake adequacy in a Mediterranean cohort: the SUN (Seguimiento Universidad de Navarra) Project

Abstract: Epidemiological research confirms that the prevalence of suboptimal micronutrient intakes across Europe is an emerging concern in terms of public health. The aim of the present study was to investigate the association between a new index of carbohydrate (CHO) quality and micronutrient intake adequacy in the 'Seguimiento Universidad de Navarra (SUN)' cohort. The baseline assessment extended from 1999 to March 2012. We assessed 16 841 participants who completed a validated 136-item semi-quantitative FFQ at basel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
84
0
15

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
5
84
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the robustness of findings in additional sensitivity analyses is other strength. Finally, although the CQI has been previously used to assess micronutrient intake adequacy, 23 to our knowledge it has not been used before in assessing weight change and obesity which could be helpful in dietary advice related to weight management in young adults.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, the robustness of findings in additional sensitivity analyses is other strength. Finally, although the CQI has been previously used to assess micronutrient intake adequacy, 23 to our knowledge it has not been used before in assessing weight change and obesity which could be helpful in dietary advice related to weight management in young adults.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 We used baseline dietary intake data to identify a carbohydrate quality index. 23 The carbohydrate quality index (CQI) was defined summing up the following four criteria:…”
Section: Dietary Assessment and Calculation Of Cqimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, only a previous study recently published has reported in a Mediterranean cohort of university graduates, the association of multidimensional indexes of CHO or fat with nutritional adequacy [14]. In the present study, we investigated the association between nutritional quality measured by a CHO quality index (CQI) or a fat quality index (FQI), and overall nutritional adequacy considering 19 micronutrients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The CQI was defined summing up the following four criteria: dietary fiber intake (g per day, positively weighted), GI (negatively weighted), ratio whole grains/ total grains (positively weighted), and finally, ratio solid CHO/(solid CHO + liquid CHO) (positively weighted) [14]. For each of these four components, we categorized participants into quintiles and received a value (ranging from 1 to 5) according to each quintile (for GI, those in the fifth quintile received 1 point and those in the first quintile received 5 points).…”
Section: Exposure Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, high-GL diets can result in rapid late postingestive decreases in blood glucose with a tendency to hypoglycemia, which could be responsible for triggering central dysfunction and depression, thus possibly contributing to the higher prevalence of depression among patients with diabetes (22). In addition, high-GI and high-GL diets may contain lower amounts of fiber, fruit, vegetables, and whole grains (23)(24)(25) and, consequently, provide lower amounts of some key nutrients for the nervous system compared with low-GI and low-GL diets, and, thus, may adversely affect mood disorders. However, findings in this context have been controversial in clinical trials (26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31) and observational and longitudinal studies (32)(33)(34)(35)(36).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%