Association between depression, patient scar assessment and burn-specific health in hospitalized burn patients

Roh, Young Sook; Chung, Hyun Soo; Kwon, Boeun; Kim, GiYon

doi:10.1016/j.burns.2011.12.027

Cited by 35 publications

(19 citation statements)

References 34 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In the above mentioned paper by Willebrand and Kildal [20] the anxiety and depression score of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale negatively correlated with the skin involvement and the affect and relationship domains and, less strongly, with the function domain and the work subscales. Furthermore, in a Korean sample of hospitalized burn patients assessed two months after the burn trauma, the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) correlated with all BSHS-B subscales, particularly with affect, body image, treatment regimens and heat sensitivity [30]. Similarly, in another sample of Brazilian out-patients assessed within 1 year from injury, the Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI) showed strong correlations with the affect and body image domain and the interpersonal relationship domain of BSHS-R [31].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Validation of the Italian version of the Burn Specific Health Scale-Brief

Sideli

Pasquale

Prestifilippo

et al. 2014

Burns

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Validation of the Italian version of the Burn Specific Health Scale-Brief

Sideli

Pasquale

Prestifilippo

et al. 2014

Burns

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…In this manner, burn patients may experience various psychosocial and emotional difficulties. However, previous studies regarding burn patients have mainly focused on physical treatment, including wound care (Lee et al., ; Stoddard et al., ), nutrition therapy (Cho, ; Roh, Chung, Kwon, & Kim, ), and scar pain treatment (Cho & Seo, ; Ullrich, Askay, & Patterson, ), among others. Protein, vitamin C, zinc, and copper for healing of burn wounds have been described as appropriate nutrition therapy (Cho, ; Roh et al, ), and medication use and dressing treatment have been described for alleviation of pain (Cho & Seo, ; Ullrich et al, ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, previous studies regarding burn patients have mainly focused on physical treatment, including wound care (Lee et al., ; Stoddard et al., ), nutrition therapy (Cho, ; Roh, Chung, Kwon, & Kim, ), and scar pain treatment (Cho & Seo, ; Ullrich, Askay, & Patterson, ), among others. Protein, vitamin C, zinc, and copper for healing of burn wounds have been described as appropriate nutrition therapy (Cho, ; Roh et al, ), and medication use and dressing treatment have been described for alleviation of pain (Cho & Seo, ; Ullrich et al, ). With regard to psychological or emotional problems of burn patients, some studies have been conducted on pain and anxiety (Park, ; Ullrich et al., ), body image and self‐esteem (Hoogewerf et al., ; No, ), and quality of life (Seo et al., ; Stavrou et al., ), among others.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Factors Influencing Resilience of Burn Patients in South Korea

Jang

Park

Chong

et al. 2017

J of Nursing Scholarship

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In our study, it was determined that OSAS scores increased significantly as the burn grade increased (p<0.05). Roh et al (23) determined that depressive findings increase as burn surface areas increase, patients who have more depressive findings evaluate their scars worse and their quality of life is affected negatively. Tuna and Çetin (24) indicated that the degree of burn increases, the quality of life scores of patients decreases.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale in Patients with Burns

Aydoğan¹,

Kabuk²,

Kazan³

2017

tdd

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ÖzAmaç: Hasta ve Gözlemci Skar Değerlendirme Ölçeği'nin (HGSDÖ) Türkçe formunun yanık hastalarında geçerlik ve güvenirliğini değerlendirmek amacıyla yapılmıştır. Yöntemler: Metodolojik tipte bir çalışmadır. Çalışmanın verileri HGSDÖ, anket formu ve pleksiglas kullanılarak toplanmıştır. Hasta Skar Değerlendirme Ölçeği (HSDÖ) hastalar tarafından (n=53), Gözlemci Skar Değerlendirme Ölçeği (GSDÖ) birbirinden bağımsız iki gözlemci tarafından doldurulmuştur. İki hafta sonra ölçekler 25 hastaya tekrar uygulanmıştır. Veriler Kruskal-Wallis ve Mann-Whitney U testi ile analiz edilmiştir. Ölçeğin kapsam geçerliğinde Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin ve Barlett testi, yapı geçerliğinde Açıklayıcı Faktör Analizi (AFA) ve Doğrulayıcı Faktör Analizi (DFA), güvenirliğin değerlendirilmesinde iç tutarlılık, Cronbach's alpha ve intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) ile bakılmıştır. HGSDÖ'de yer alan 7. madde, orijinal ölçekte olduğu gibi, ölçeğin puanı dışında tutularak değerlendirilmiştir. Bulgular: AFA'ya göre ölçeğin faktör yüklerinin uygun aralıkta, DFA'ya göre orijinal ölçeğin 6 madde tek faktörlü yapısının geçerli ve uyum indekslerinin yüksek, ölçeğin toplam puanı ile 7. madde arasında ICC'nin doğru orantılı, iç tutarlılığın yüksek derecede güvenilir (HSDÖ α=0,992, GSDÖ α=0,993), gözlemciler arasında tutarlılığın yüksek (α=0,952, r=0,909) olduğu saptanmıştır. Hastaların yanıklarının derecesi arttığında, GSDÖ puanının anlamlı derecede arttığı belirlenmiştir (p<0,05). Sonuç: HGSDÖ'nün Türk toplumu için yanık hastalarında geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçek olduğu belirlenmiştir. Anahtar kelimeler: Yanık, skar, ölçek, güvenirlik ve geçerlik, hasta, gözlemci Objective: To evaluation reliability and validity of the Turkish version of Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) in patients with burns. Methods: This is a methodologically study. Data were collected using POSAS, survey form and plexiglas. Patient Scar Assessment Scale (PSAS) was completed by patients (n=53) and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (OSAS) was completed by two observers separately. The test-retest was measured applying the scales in 25 patients after two weeks. Data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U test. Content validity was determined using Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin, Barlett's test and structure validity was performed by explanatory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA); reliability was evaluated using internal consistency, Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results: Factor weights were in appropriate range according to EFA, 6 items single factor structure of the original scale was valid and had high consistency index according to CFA, ICC between the 7 th item and the total points was proportional, inner consistency was highly reliable (PSAS α=0.992, OSAS α=0.993), consistency between the observers was high (α=0.952, r=0.909). It was determined OSAS scores increased as the burn degree increased (p<0.05). Conclusion: POSAS was determined to be a valid and reliable scale in patients with burns in t...

show abstract

Association between depression, patient scar assessment and burn-specific health in hospitalized burn patients

Cited by 35 publications

References 34 publications

Validation of the Italian version of the Burn Specific Health Scale-Brief

Validation of the Italian version of the Burn Specific Health Scale-Brief

Factors Influencing Resilience of Burn Patients in South Korea

Reliability and Validity of the Turkish Version of Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale in Patients with Burns

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About