2015
DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000001046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged Hepatectomy Offers High Oncological Feasibility With Adequate Patient Safety

Abstract: This prospective study on the largest reported single-center experience shows that ALPPS has acceptable morbidity and mortality, together with a high oncological feasibility and hypertrophic efficacy. Partial parenchymal transection seems to reduce morbidity without negatively impacting FLR hypertrophy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
115
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
7
115
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This first presentation of ALPPS attracted tremendous international interest and hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) groups from all over the world began to work in the field of ALPPS. Shortly thereafter, further reports confirmed the initial promising results and, in addition, it could be shown that ALPPS was effective even after the failure of PVE [20-26]. In an early retrospective analysis at 4 specialized HPB centers comparing data of ALPPS and extended hepatectomy following PVE/PVL, complete tumor resection was significantly better in ALPPS with similar survival rates.…”
supporting
confidence: 50%
“…This first presentation of ALPPS attracted tremendous international interest and hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) groups from all over the world began to work in the field of ALPPS. Shortly thereafter, further reports confirmed the initial promising results and, in addition, it could be shown that ALPPS was effective even after the failure of PVE [20-26]. In an early retrospective analysis at 4 specialized HPB centers comparing data of ALPPS and extended hepatectomy following PVE/PVL, complete tumor resection was significantly better in ALPPS with similar survival rates.…”
supporting
confidence: 50%
“…ALPPS consists of 3 major steps: stage I - portal branch occlusion and ISS; an interstage waiting period of usually 6-28 days [16,17,18,19,20,21,22]; and stage II - resection of the portally occluded, atrophic liver parts. Stage I: The surgical technique was described in detail by Schnitzbauer et al [15] and later by Alvarez et al [21] in 2013.…”
Section: Operative Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lo que se menciona es que ALPPS es una alternativa que ofrece una mejor oportunidad de una resección completa respecto de la técnica convencional. Existen algunos estudios que han comunicado que no habría diferencias en la magnitud de la hipertrofia ni en la morbilidad postoperatoria (Shindoh et al, 2013;Schadde et al, 2014b;Alvarez et al, 2015); aunque sí en una mayor mortalidad postoperatoria. La hipertrofia del remanente con ALPPS se ha verificado en algunas series sobre el 80 % (Sala et al;Torres et al;Li et al, 2013;Nadalin et al;Schadde et al, 2014b;Alvarez et al, 2015;Lang et al); lo que puede estar asociado a diversas variables, como la co-existencia de co-morbilidades, las características del parénquima hepático, quimioterapia adyuvante, origen y extensión de la enfermedad metastásica, uso de clampeo intermitente, tiempo entre una etapa y otra, etc.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified