Assistive Technology and Developmental Disabilities

Wallace, Joseph F.

doi:10.1002/0471227579.ch28

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…). Five studies were scored as a complementary study (Parette ; Kemp & Parette ; Hourcade & Parette ; Wallace ; Braddock et al . ).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Twenty-two studies were scored as a key study, following the quality assessment and relevance score (Parette Jr & Vanbiervliet 1992;Wehmeyer 1995;Brodin 1998;Wehmeyer 1998;Wehmeyer 1999 Lersilp et al 2015;Boot et al 2017). Five studies were scored as a complementary study (Parette 1997;Kemp & Parette 2000;Hourcade & Parette 2001;Wallace 2002;Braddock et al 2004). The majority of the studies included were quantitative studies (13/ 27), followed by perspective articles (7/27), studies that included mixed methods design (3/27), case studies (2/27) and qualitative studies (2/27).…”

Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Access to assistive technology for people with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review to identify barriers and facilitators

Boot

Owuor

Dinsmore

et al. 2018

J intellect Disabil Res

106

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The World Health Organisation has launched a programme to promote Global Cooperation on Assistive Technology. Its aim is to increase access to high-quality affordable assistive products (AP) for everybody in need. People with intellectual disabilities (ID) are a specific group that could benefit from AP, but use less AP compared to their non-intellectual disabled peers. Method A systematic literature search was carried out to identify barriers and potential facilitators for access to AP for people with ID globally. The search strategy terms were 'Intellectual Disability' and 'Assistive Technology' with the following electronic literature databases PubMed, Embase, ASSIA, Web of Science, Medline, CINAHL complete, PsycInfo, Scopus and ERIC. The quality and relevance of the studies were assessed. Factors associated with access were identified thematically, categorised into barriers and facilitators and mapped into themes.

show abstract

“…). Five studies were scored as a complementary study (Parette ; Kemp & Parette ; Hourcade & Parette ; Wallace ; Braddock et al . ).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%