Transgenic Animal Technology 2014
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-410490-7.00022-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assisted Reproductive Technologies and Embryo Culture Methods for Farm Animals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 259 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the age of the oocyte influences the tolerance of embryos to in vitro manipulation [ 10 ]. Bisection and in vitro culture allow the identification of viable demi-embryos to increase the number of available embryos [ 1 ]. In the present study, the total rate of viable reconstituted demi-embryos was 139.5% of the manipulated blastocysts, which agrees with 152% reported by Hashiyada [ 2 ] in cattle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, the age of the oocyte influences the tolerance of embryos to in vitro manipulation [ 10 ]. Bisection and in vitro culture allow the identification of viable demi-embryos to increase the number of available embryos [ 1 ]. In the present study, the total rate of viable reconstituted demi-embryos was 139.5% of the manipulated blastocysts, which agrees with 152% reported by Hashiyada [ 2 ] in cattle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In vitro embryo production (IVEP) has been implemented in genetic improvement programs and basic research on animal reproduction. Blastocysts can be split to increase the number of viable demi-embryos for transfer to recipient females and increase the number of offspring [ 1 ]. On the other hand, the efficiency of embryo bisection is affected by the quality and origin of the whole embryo [ 2 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Doudna, Charpentier, and co-workers [Jinek et al, 2012;Doudna and Charpentier, 2014] focused on and exposed how the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) and CRISPR-associated (Cas) protein complexes (CRISPR/Cas), which roughly 50% of bacteria and 90% of archaea possess [Makarova et al, 2015], act together to excise and/or neutralize intrusive foreign genetic material by precision genome-editing and manipulation [Diemen et al, 2015;Nelles et al, 2016;Nun~ez et al, 2016;Wright et al, 2016]. The CRISPR/Cas9 system, and evolving engineered variations [Dunn and Pinkert, 2014;Abudayyeh et al, 2016;Komor et al, 2016;Luo et al, 2016;Slaymaker et al, 2016;Wang et al, 2016a,b], are quickly becoming the gene-editing tools of choice for specificity in human cells-with great potential for drug discovery and development [Golkar et al, 2016], and for correcting disease-causing mutatedgenes in human embryos [Boeke et al, 2016;Ledford, 2016], but hopefully not as an incremental step toward the creation of "designer" babies [Godke et al, 2014;Pinkert et al, 2014;Bosley et al, 2015;Annas, 2016;Greely, 2016].…”
Section: Synthetic Biology Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This tool allows a genetically superior female to produce a greater number of embryos (and consequently offspring) during her reproductive life. Under natural mating or artificial insemination systems, a cow would give birth to only one offspring per year [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%