2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2014.12.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessments of antibacterial and physico-mechanical properties for dental materials with chemically anchored quaternary ammonium moieties: Thiol–ene–methacrylate vs. conventional methacrylate system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(89 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These stresses and resulting strains may contribute to crack propagation in the filling material, leakage along the tooth-filling interface, bacterial invasion and secondary caries [321,322]. Burujeny and colleagues fabricated thiol-ene-methacrylate containing quaternary amine moieties with reduced polymerization shrinkage stress and strain and improved antibacterial effectiveness [247]. Reduction in polymerization shrinkage has been attributed to the nature of thiol-ene polymerization; delayed gelation produces more homogeneous structure with narrow glass transition temperature ranges and reduced brittleness in comparison with classic methacrylate resin systems [323,324].…”
Section: Dental Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These stresses and resulting strains may contribute to crack propagation in the filling material, leakage along the tooth-filling interface, bacterial invasion and secondary caries [321,322]. Burujeny and colleagues fabricated thiol-ene-methacrylate containing quaternary amine moieties with reduced polymerization shrinkage stress and strain and improved antibacterial effectiveness [247]. Reduction in polymerization shrinkage has been attributed to the nature of thiol-ene polymerization; delayed gelation produces more homogeneous structure with narrow glass transition temperature ranges and reduced brittleness in comparison with classic methacrylate resin systems [323,324].…”
Section: Dental Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is claimed that the great advantage of this approach is that the bioactive agent is not released from the matrix, which could contribute to the maintenance of the composites’ properties 8 . However, previous reports have shown that depending on the functionality and the concentration in which they are immobilized into the organic matrix, MQAMs can also reduce the mechanical properties 19 , and increase the water sorption of the composites 4 . Different bacteriostatic and bactericide chemicals, e.g., chlorhexidine, Ag salts and particles, oxides, and others, have also been tested to confer antibacterial activity to resin composites 7 , 25 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The adhesive exerted stable and long-lasting antibacterial effects because this monomer was immobilized in the resin with limited release of bacterial agent. Burujeny et al [ 83 ] evaluated the antibacterial activity of QAMs against S. aureus and E. coli to judge the release behavior of antibacterial agent in resin composite. It was indicated that no inhibition zone was detected around the samples, and the nonreleasing behavior of active ingredient was confirmed.…”
Section: Antimicrobial Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They concluded that the inclusion of antimicrobial component quaternary ammonium species did not adversely affect the cytotoxicity of the dentine adhesive. Burujeny et al [ 83 ] found that the copolymerization of quaternary ammonium salt-containing monomers (QASM) incorporating thiolene-rich resin improved the biocompatibility of resin, which provided significant improvement in the biocompatibility of dental materials. Li et al [ 53 ] incorporated monomers of DMAEDM, DMADDM, and Bis-GMA into dental resin composites, and measured their cytotoxicity using a methyl thiazolyltetrazolium assay and live/dead viability assay.…”
Section: Antimicrobial Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%