2013
DOI: 10.5194/isprsarchives-xl-5-w1-167-2013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessments for 3d Reconstructions of Cultural Heritage Using Digital Technologies

Abstract: ABSTRACT:The aim of this contribution is to show the results of evaluations on 3D digitizations performed using different methodologies and technologies. In particular, for surveys conducted at the architectural and urban scale, the recent reduction of costs related to Time of Flight and phase shift laser scanners is actually enhancing the replacement of traditional topographic instruments (i.e. total stations) with range-based technologies for the acquisition of 3D data related to built heritage. If compared … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In both cases (TLS and SfM), the final output is a point cloud or a 3d mesh model that can be used as tracking reference systems for the definition of parametric elements suitable for the BIM model. The literature shows that improvements in digital photogrammetry that mean that we can consider it a reliable technique in the 3D acquisition field, comparable with results from laser scanners [8][9][10][11][12]. The decision of choosing one of the two techniques before mentioned (TLS of SfM) could be done in relation of the morphology and the accessibly of the area (due to the maneuverability of the tools) but, at the same time, connected on costs evaluation.…”
Section: Data Acquisition: Tls Sfm and Uavmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In both cases (TLS and SfM), the final output is a point cloud or a 3d mesh model that can be used as tracking reference systems for the definition of parametric elements suitable for the BIM model. The literature shows that improvements in digital photogrammetry that mean that we can consider it a reliable technique in the 3D acquisition field, comparable with results from laser scanners [8][9][10][11][12]. The decision of choosing one of the two techniques before mentioned (TLS of SfM) could be done in relation of the morphology and the accessibly of the area (due to the maneuverability of the tools) but, at the same time, connected on costs evaluation.…”
Section: Data Acquisition: Tls Sfm and Uavmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, the combination of Laser Scanning outputs and Digital Photogrammetry ones can be delicate, as the devices must be both properly calibrated, and error propagation is likely to occur [53]. It is also possible to compose a structure from high-resolution images through Structure from Motion (SfM) [50,55] methodology. SfM is based on the principle that 4 non-coplanar surfaces can be detected by three orthographic projections [55].…”
Section: Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last decade a new surveying methodology based on Structure from Motion (SfM) algorithms has been developed, implemented and applied in the Cultural Heritage field of studies (El-Hakim et al, 2003;Barazzetti et al, 2010;Doneus et al, 2011;Verhoeven et al, 2011;Verhoeven et al, 2012;Lo Brutto et al, 2012;De Reu et al, 2013;Manfredini et al, 2013). Although these procedures may suffer from reduced accuracy when applied to large structures and buildings without the support of a proper topographic survey, they resulted suitable for the purpose of the present study, i.e.…”
Section: Structure From Motionmentioning
confidence: 99%