2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.coastaleng.2019.103630
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of wave height distributions using an extensive field database

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
34
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
6
34
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, more and more studies approached the problem from a different angle: by inferring the dependence of rogue wave occurrence on the sea state from observed field data 3 , 5 , 11 , 18 . However, no study has so far quantified the probability to encounter a rogue wave depending on the sea state throughout a wide regime of conditions, taking into account more than one parameter at a time, and in a statistically robust fashion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, more and more studies approached the problem from a different angle: by inferring the dependence of rogue wave occurrence on the sea state from observed field data 3 , 5 , 11 , 18 . However, no study has so far quantified the probability to encounter a rogue wave depending on the sea state throughout a wide regime of conditions, taking into account more than one parameter at a time, and in a statistically robust fashion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The identification of the most suitable statistical distribution model for describing the measured deep seawater waves data during storms [1]. Suitability of several deep-water waves heights distribution models, such as the Rayleigh model [2], the Forristall model [3], the Naess model [4], and the Tayfun -Fedele 3rd order model [5], were considered and their ability to fit the empirical data was compared.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the steepness in eqs. (17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22) will be corrected by the vertical asymmetry S 0 , which in turn modifies the correction parameter:…”
Section: B Stokes Second-order Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the resulting distribution cannot account for the influence of sea state parameters [16][17][18]. For similar reasons, higher-order analytical distributions share this inability [19,20]. Though the standard approach has reached considerable success in explaining the observed directional spectrum and wave properties [21][22][23], according to Donelan et al [24], the need for the ergodicity and stationarity assumptions essentially prevent the use of spectral analysis techniques in unsteady conditions or during isolated events, such as rogue waves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%