2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2011.01.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of turbulence modeling for gas flow in two-dimensional convergent–divergent rocket nozzle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
1
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
35
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[21]. According to Balabel [22] it found that the numerical predictions using the SST-k-ω turbulence model show close agreement with the experimental measurements. In addition, it found by Bartosiewicza et al [21] that the RNG and SSTk-ω models are the best suited to predict the shock phase, strength, and the mean line of pressure recovery.…”
Section: Turbulence Modelingmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…[21]. According to Balabel [22] it found that the numerical predictions using the SST-k-ω turbulence model show close agreement with the experimental measurements. In addition, it found by Bartosiewicza et al [21] that the RNG and SSTk-ω models are the best suited to predict the shock phase, strength, and the mean line of pressure recovery.…”
Section: Turbulence Modelingmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…The separation region formed downstream can be considered as consequence of the adverse pressure gradient through the shock, which forces the incoming boundary layer to separate. The oblique shock structures are of the weak type resulting in low supersonic flow downstream while the flow immediately past the Mach stem is subsonic as discussed as reported [22].…”
Section: Velocity Profilesmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Coaxial devices have also been proposed: in the SEDS process (solution enhanced dispersion by supercritical fluids) a coaxial twin-fluid nozzle to co-introduce the SCF antisolvent and solution is used (Bałdyga et al, 2010;He et al, 2010;Mawson et al, 1997;Wena et al, 2010). Complex nozzles geometries have also been tested carrying out a comparative study of the nozzle by computational fluid dynamics (Balabel et al, 2011;Bouchard et al, 2008). Petit-Gas et al found that for the lowest capillary internal diameter studied, there were particles with differences morphologies according to the jet velocity.…”
Section: Parameters Influence On Hydrodynamicmentioning
confidence: 99%