Assessment of Training in Health Disparities in US Internal Medicine Residency Programs

Abstract

IMPORTANCE Health disparities continue to exist despite the call to increase education of health care practitioners. An assessment of health disparities education has not been previously studied in a national cohort. OBJECTIVE To describe and compare the curriculum on health disparities from the perspective of program directors and perceptions of training among internal medicine residents. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cross-sectional survey study used a survey of US internal medicine program directors, the 2015 Association of Program Directors in Internal Medicine annual survey, which included questions about health disparities curriculum, and a 1-time survey of US internal medicine residents that asked questions related to their training in health disparities on the American College of Physicians 2015 Internal Medicine In-Training Examination. All internal medicine program directors who were members of Association of Program Directors in Internal Medicine (368 of 396 accredited programs), and internal medicine residents who took the Internal Medicine In-Training Examination were eligible. Final analysis of the merged data set was completed in 2018. EXPOSURES Questions were included on the annual Association of Program Directors in Internal Medicine survey and the Internal Medicine In-Training Examination. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Program directors reported on presence of health disparities curriculum, educational methods, quality, barriers and challenges to curriculum, and Clinical Learning Environment Review. Residents reported whether they received training and quality of the training in health disparities. RESULTS A total of 227 program directors (response rate, 61.7%) and 22 723 residents (response rate, 87.2%) responded to the surveys. A total of 90 program directors (39.6%) reported a curriculum in health disparities, but among these, only 16 program directors (17.8%) felt quality of their education was very good or excellent. In more than half of the programs (52 programs [55.9%]), outcomes of the curriculum were not measured. After merging, the combined data set included 18 883 residents from 366 APDIM member programs with 225 program director responses. Among these, 13 251 residents (70.2%) reported some training in caring for patients at risk for health disparities. Of residents who reported receiving training, 10 494 (79.2%) rated the quality as very good or excellent. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE These findings suggest that that despite the Clinical Learning Environment Review mandate and Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education required competencies for training in health disparities, relatively few internal medicine programs in the US (continued) Key Points Question Are internal medicine residents being trained to address health disparities, and what are their perceptions of such training? Findings This survey study of 227 program directors and 22 723 internal medicine residents in training found that residents' perceptions of training in health disparities and its quality were...

Feasibility of an Antiracism Curriculum in an Academic Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine Division

“…Despite this, few programs have instituted curricula. A study from 2020 among internal medicine residencies found only 39.6% of programs reported having a curriculum on health disparities ( 31 ). Moreover, there is evidence that the task of providing education focused on health disparities and racism falls disproportionately on trainees and faculty from racial and ethnic groups that have been historically underrepresented in medicine, often without resources or support, a phenomenon known as the “minority tax.” ( 32 ) Of the limited number of publications on health disparities training in residency, 94% originate from primary care ( 33 ).…”

Piloting web-based structural competency modules among internal medicine residents and graduate students in public health

“…While most internal medicine residents rate the quality of the health equity training they receive as very good or excellent, most program directors do not ( 9 ). This leadership's awareness of the lackadaisical nature of institutional support for health equity training also highlights the magnitude of this gap in education.…”

“…Residents who have undergone structural competency report that the training had a positive impact on their clinical practice and relationship with patients ( 8 ). Still, the majority of internal medicine residency curricula do not include health disparities as a topic ( 9 ).…”

Poverty Related Education in Pediatrics: Current State, Gaps and Call to Action

“…medicine programs reported a health disparities curricthe majority reported no formal evaluation, thus effectiveness remains unknown. 9 For studies that did have an evaluation component, 10 most focused on lower level outcomes such as learner satisfaction and knowledge change. 14…”