2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajme.2012.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of the progress of labor by the use of intrapartum ultrasound

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the current work transperineal ultrasound was done successfully, easily and with very short time for all women included in the study, and all women tolerated the procedure well without any discomfort, these results agreed with that reported by Khalil et al (1) and Barbera et al (10) Kalache et al (13)mentioned that the measurement of the angle of progression is a simple ultrasound technique as it depends on two easily depicted ultrasound markers, one maternal pelvic (pubic symphysis) and one fetal (leading body edge of fetal skull) structure. This approach definitely overcomes some of limitations associated with transperineal ultrasound imaging such as difficulty to visualize the ischial spines which are the reference point where fetal head descent is determined subjectively by digital vaginal examination, also Barbera et al (10) reported that head edema and caput formation will not affect the angle measured by ultrasound.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the current work transperineal ultrasound was done successfully, easily and with very short time for all women included in the study, and all women tolerated the procedure well without any discomfort, these results agreed with that reported by Khalil et al (1) and Barbera et al (10) Kalache et al (13)mentioned that the measurement of the angle of progression is a simple ultrasound technique as it depends on two easily depicted ultrasound markers, one maternal pelvic (pubic symphysis) and one fetal (leading body edge of fetal skull) structure. This approach definitely overcomes some of limitations associated with transperineal ultrasound imaging such as difficulty to visualize the ischial spines which are the reference point where fetal head descent is determined subjectively by digital vaginal examination, also Barbera et al (10) reported that head edema and caput formation will not affect the angle measured by ultrasound.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…The simple objective of any pregnancy is the delivery of a healthy baby to a healthy mother (1). Adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes have been related to prolonged second stage of labor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In agreement with these results, the study of Khalil et al (12) , revealed that the mean was 24.8 years and median gravidity was 2 with a range from G1 to G7, and the mean gestational age ranging from 37 to 41 weeks and the mean was 39.3 week.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…12 Recent reports suggest that intrapartum ultrasound imaging may be of assistance in overcoming these problems by facilitating application of a series of evaluations for determination of fetal head position and progression during labor. [1][2][3][4][5][6] This would offer a better prediction of successful vaginal delivery.…”
Section: Intrapartum Ultrasound In Labormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prognosis for operative vaginal delivery can also be assessed by intrapartum ultrasonography. 2 Avoiding complicated vaginal delivery is the primary focal point of the current obstetric practice. Digital transvaginal examination, which is highly dependent on the clinician's ability and is still regarded 'gold standard' for obstetric practice, has several limitations.…”
Section: Intrapartum Ultrasonography For Prediction Of Vaginal Delivementioning
confidence: 99%