2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00231-014-1399-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of the performance of a natural gas liquefaction cycle using natural refrigerants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The MRC with pre-cooling fully absorbs the advantages of the cascade cycle and reduces the total power consumption by adding the pre-cooling link. Both APCI and Shell of the United States can adjust the amount of liquid refrigerant by controlling the temperature of the mixed refrigerant after pre-cooling, which greatly increases operation flexibility and boosts cooling efficiency [24][25][26].…”
Section: Open Mrc Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MRC with pre-cooling fully absorbs the advantages of the cascade cycle and reduces the total power consumption by adding the pre-cooling link. Both APCI and Shell of the United States can adjust the amount of liquid refrigerant by controlling the temperature of the mixed refrigerant after pre-cooling, which greatly increases operation flexibility and boosts cooling efficiency [24][25][26].…”
Section: Open Mrc Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the results it can be deduced that change in the operating conditions of the propane evaporator results in a lower entropy generation which reduces the exergy loss and increases the exergy efficiency. Exergy loss is influenced by larger temperature or pressure difference applied across the refrigerant stream and not by the number of equipment used in the propane cycle [31]. Based on the exergy analysis, it can be concluded that both the valves and the compressors are the main contributors of exergy loss.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%