2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11682-013-9237-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of the feasibility of a rehabilitation intervention program for breast cancer survivors with cognitive complaints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
49
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We recorded awake, resting state EEGs at T1, T2, and T3, from 35 scalp electrodes using methods identical to those reported previously . Absolute power (μV 2 ) and relative power (percentage of total power) were calculated for each channel in: delta (0.5–4 Hz), theta (4–8 Hz), alpha (8–13 Hz), and beta (13–20 Hz).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We recorded awake, resting state EEGs at T1, T2, and T3, from 35 scalp electrodes using methods identical to those reported previously . Absolute power (μV 2 ) and relative power (percentage of total power) were calculated for each channel in: delta (0.5–4 Hz), theta (4–8 Hz), alpha (8–13 Hz), and beta (13–20 Hz).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants were recruited from the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) cognitive rehabilitation study (CRS) for BCS with cognitive complaints [6] and the UCLA mind body study (MBS)-a prospective study of early stage, posttreatment breast cancer patients [1]. All patients had been treated for stage 0, I, II, or IIIA breast cancer and were on no active cancer therapy other than possible endocrine therapy.…”
Section: Participants and Recruitmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Cognitive Rehabilitation Study sample (n=72) consisted of female breast cancer survivors with persistent cognitive complaints following primary treatment for cancer recruited for two separate clinical trials of a cognitive remediation protocol [18, 19]. Baseline data were used in the current study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%