2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2011.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of the consistency of ideal profiles according to non-ideal data for IPM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
43
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also a good complement to the assessment of the consistency of the ideal descriptions proposed by Worch et al (2012), which aims at studying the sensory consistency of the ideal profiles by measuring the relationship between the ideal descriptions and the sensory and hedonic ratings of the products.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is also a good complement to the assessment of the consistency of the ideal descriptions proposed by Worch et al (2012), which aims at studying the sensory consistency of the ideal profiles by measuring the relationship between the ideal descriptions and the sensory and hedonic ratings of the products.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Worch et al (2012), an ideal profile is consistent if: (1) Its sensory profile agrees with both the sensory and hedonic ratings provided of the tested products, and (2) its estimated liking potential is high.…”
Section: Significance Test Of the Liking Potential Of The Ideal Profilesmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The same notation as the one used in the paper from Worch, Lê, Punter, and Pagès (2012) checking for the consistency of the ideal data obtained from the IPM are used here. Hence, we denote in the rest of the article (the vectors are in bold):…”
Section: Notationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Link between the maps (a priori). According to Worch et al (2012), a consumer is consistent if the ideal product provided shares similar characteristics with the preferred product.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Idmap And The Prefmapdmentioning
confidence: 99%