Assessment of the Attitude and Knowledge of the Principles and Practices of Orthodontic Treatment Among the Non-orthodontic Specialists and General Practitioner Dentists
Abstract:Introduction: General practitioner dentists and non-orthodontic specialties ought to have the knowledge of the basic principles and practices of orthodontics in order to educate the patients, diagnose their problems correctly and for proper referral. The objective of the present study is to assess the attitude and knowledge of the general practitioner dentists and non-orthodontic specialists towards the basic principles and practices of orthodontics.
Methods: This study was performed by presenting a clos… Show more
“…In contrast to the present study, study done by Kapoor et al have shown statistically significant knowledge and attitude difference between general dentists and nonorthodontic specialists. 8 Similarly, Sastri et al showed that the scores were more for the non-orthodontic specialists and the difference was statistically significant. 6 In another study done in Saudi Arabia, when the scores of knowledge were compared between general dental practitioner and non-orthodontic specialties, a statistically significant difference was noted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In such case, it is essential for a dentist to identify and diagnose the orthodontic cause and advice for a referral. 8 Therefore, there is a need to identify the knowledge level of general dental practitioners and nonorthodontist specialists with respect to the orthodontic treatment. The objective of the study was to assess the knowledge of orthodontic treatment among general dentists and non-orthodontic specialists and to compare the knowledge of orthodontic treatment between the two groups.…”
Introduction: General dentists and specialists other than orthodontist may encounter patient requiring orthodontic treatment. For proper counseling and referral, it is important that general dentists and non-orthodontic specialists have adequate level of orthodontic knowledge.
Objective: To assess the knowledge of orthodontic treatment among general dentists and non-orthodontic specialists and to compare the knowledge between the two groups.
Materials & Method: A descriptive cross sectional study using questionnaire was performed among 185 actively practicing general dentists and non-orthodontic specialists of Nepal. The questionnaire comprised of three parts. The first part included demographic details, second part contained 5 multiple choice questions regarding orthodontic counseling and third part integrated 18 questions for evaluating knowledge of orthodontic treatment. Each correct answer was given score 1 and every incorrect answer was scored zero in the third part of the questionnaire.
Result: Among total participants, 60.5% think first orthodontic evaluation of a child should be carried out within 7 to 8 years of age and 44.3% think orthodontic treatment can even be started after 40 years of age. Around 66% of the participants think that orthodontic treatment cannot be performed in periodontally compromised cases. No significant difference was found between the mean scores of knowledge among general dentists and non-orthodontic specialists (p=0.891), or among dentists with different years of experience (p=0.644).
Conclusion: There is a need for more education of orthodontic treatment concepts to the dentists who do not belong to orthodontic field for proper counseling and referral.
“…In contrast to the present study, study done by Kapoor et al have shown statistically significant knowledge and attitude difference between general dentists and nonorthodontic specialists. 8 Similarly, Sastri et al showed that the scores were more for the non-orthodontic specialists and the difference was statistically significant. 6 In another study done in Saudi Arabia, when the scores of knowledge were compared between general dental practitioner and non-orthodontic specialties, a statistically significant difference was noted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In such case, it is essential for a dentist to identify and diagnose the orthodontic cause and advice for a referral. 8 Therefore, there is a need to identify the knowledge level of general dental practitioners and nonorthodontist specialists with respect to the orthodontic treatment. The objective of the study was to assess the knowledge of orthodontic treatment among general dentists and non-orthodontic specialists and to compare the knowledge of orthodontic treatment between the two groups.…”
Introduction: General dentists and specialists other than orthodontist may encounter patient requiring orthodontic treatment. For proper counseling and referral, it is important that general dentists and non-orthodontic specialists have adequate level of orthodontic knowledge.
Objective: To assess the knowledge of orthodontic treatment among general dentists and non-orthodontic specialists and to compare the knowledge between the two groups.
Materials & Method: A descriptive cross sectional study using questionnaire was performed among 185 actively practicing general dentists and non-orthodontic specialists of Nepal. The questionnaire comprised of three parts. The first part included demographic details, second part contained 5 multiple choice questions regarding orthodontic counseling and third part integrated 18 questions for evaluating knowledge of orthodontic treatment. Each correct answer was given score 1 and every incorrect answer was scored zero in the third part of the questionnaire.
Result: Among total participants, 60.5% think first orthodontic evaluation of a child should be carried out within 7 to 8 years of age and 44.3% think orthodontic treatment can even be started after 40 years of age. Around 66% of the participants think that orthodontic treatment cannot be performed in periodontally compromised cases. No significant difference was found between the mean scores of knowledge among general dentists and non-orthodontic specialists (p=0.891), or among dentists with different years of experience (p=0.644).
Conclusion: There is a need for more education of orthodontic treatment concepts to the dentists who do not belong to orthodontic field for proper counseling and referral.
“…They should be aware of the common understanding of orthodontic problems and develop a habit of referral to an orthodontist. A study conducted to evaluate the basic knowledge and practices of GDPs and non-orthodontist practitioners revealed reduced knowledge and practices 8,9 .…”
Objective: To evaluate the awareness of orthodontic problems and referral
practices among general dental practitioners and non-orthodontic specialists
practicing in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Methods: Cross-sectional prospective
study included general dentists and specialists/consultants of both genders,
aged between 22-60 years, practicing General dentistry and as specialist
other than orthodontics for 2 or more years. Non-practicing dentists and
non-registered dentists were excluded. Data was analysed on SPSS version
21.00. Results: Results revealed that males were 55.5% and general dental
practitioners were 44%. It is evident that 53.5% (107) GDPs and 33% (66) non
orthodontic specialists practiced orthodontic referral in their practices.
Cross-tabulation of variables compared with gender and general dental
practitioners and non-orthodontic specialists, using chi-square test,
revealed significant p-value of orthodontist referral, but recommendation of
orthodontic treatment only after the eruption of all permanent teeth,
awareness of tooth extraction for alignment of irregular teeth, and
awareness regarding worsening of TMJ problems by orthodontic treatment.
Conclusion: It has been concluded that the referral practices of dentists
practicing in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, concerning orthodontic patients, were
satisfactory, although awareness regarding orthodontic problem requires
unremitting learning and considerate positive progression towards basic
orthodontics.
“…Sin embargo, no se sabe mucho sobre los verdaderos beneficios de la ortodoncia interceptiva en el nivel más alto de evidencia deseado y todavía existen algunos vacíos al respecto (2). La maloclusión tiene una variedad etiológica amplia pero los resultados son bastante comu-nes, incluida la apariencia poco estética, malestar del paciente, problemas periodontales, dificultad para masticar y problemas del habla, lo cual exige un enfoque multidisciplinario por parte de cirujanos dentistas y especialistas, basado en el conocimiento de los principios y prácticas de la ortodoncia (3) . Se estima que en un 65.1% de todos los casos ortodónticos son tratados por especialistas de ortodoncia, un 3.7% por odontopediatras y un 31% son tratados por odontólogos generales (4) .…”
Percepción, conocimiento y actitud hacia la ortodoncia interceptativa en odontopediatras, ortodoncistas y cirujanos dentistas en Perú
Percepción, conocimiento y actitud hacia la ortodoncia interceptativa en odontopediatras, ortodoncistas y cirujanos dentistas en PerúPerception, knowledge and attitude towards interceptive orthodontics in pediatric dentists, orthodontists and dental surgeons in PeruPercepção, conhecimento e atitude em relação à ortodontia interceptativa em odontopediatras, ortodontistas e cirurgiões-dentistas no Peru
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.