2017
DOI: 10.5138/09750185.2106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of the antibacterial activity of four essential oils and the biobactericide Neco.

Abstract: <p>The purpose of this study was to assess <em>in vitro</em> the activity of four essential oils (<em>Cymbopogon citratus, Eucalyptus citriodora, Lippia multiflora, Melaleuca quinquenervia</em>) and the biobactericide Neco® on Gram-positive bacteria.</p><p><strong>T</strong>he aromatogram and antibiogram were assessed by the agar well diffusion method and the Muller Hinton disk-agar diffusion method, respectively. Also, the minimum inhibitory concentration … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, while the testing methods for EOs liquid fractions rely on well-defined EUCAST (European Committee for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing) and pharmacopeial recommendations [15,16], the methodology of testing EOs' volatile activity against microbes is highly diversified. These differences concern not only the experimental setting itself but also the various types of microbial aggregates scrutinized (lawn, biofilm) [17][18][19]. Moreover, also, the EOs are highly intra-species differentiated (with regard to the composition and concentration of antimicrobial compounds) caused by geographic and location factors, seasonal effects, and genetic factors, which determine the so-called chemotypes commonly found in EO-bearing plant species [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, while the testing methods for EOs liquid fractions rely on well-defined EUCAST (European Committee for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing) and pharmacopeial recommendations [15,16], the methodology of testing EOs' volatile activity against microbes is highly diversified. These differences concern not only the experimental setting itself but also the various types of microbial aggregates scrutinized (lawn, biofilm) [17][18][19]. Moreover, also, the EOs are highly intra-species differentiated (with regard to the composition and concentration of antimicrobial compounds) caused by geographic and location factors, seasonal effects, and genetic factors, which determine the so-called chemotypes commonly found in EO-bearing plant species [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The antimicrobial activity of any essential oil is not attributable to just one mechanism but to several ones widely described in the literature [ 89 ]. Factors such as climatic and environmental conditions, the origin of the plant, the plant’s adaptive metabolism, the harvesting season, the part of the plant involved in the extraction, the distillation conditions, the microbiological methods used, as well as the susceptibility of the bacterial strains would make it difficult to compare the results obtained by different groups of researchers [ 117 , 118 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S.T. Blake ( Myrtaceae ) are strongly and broadly antibacterial and antifungal [ 135 , 136 , 137 , 138 ]. The essential oil of M. quinquenervia repressed Phytophthora cactorum [ 139 ] and was strongly fungicidal for filamentous fungi [ 140 ].…”
Section: Distribution Of Antibacterial Antifungal and Antiviral Princ...mentioning
confidence: 99%