2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.microrel.2005.07.058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of the Analytical Capabilities of Scanning Capacitance and Scanning Spreading Resistance Microscopy Applied to Semiconductor Devices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cross sections were prepared by manual cleaving, and the SSRM resistance was extracted from the measured current by applying a dc bias between a Ti-Pt covered silicon tip and the sample mounted to the sample holder using conductive silver paste. Only a qualitative interpretation of the SSRM signal variations in terms of carrier concentration change is typically possible because of nonlinearity originating from ͑i͒ SSRM signal to resistivity conversion 30 and ͑ii͒ that resistivity itself is a product of carrier concentration and mobility. In addition, the SSRM signal depends on the contact resistance in the tip-sample circuit and is not identical in different ͑even sequential͒ measurements because of, e.g., tip degradation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cross sections were prepared by manual cleaving, and the SSRM resistance was extracted from the measured current by applying a dc bias between a Ti-Pt covered silicon tip and the sample mounted to the sample holder using conductive silver paste. Only a qualitative interpretation of the SSRM signal variations in terms of carrier concentration change is typically possible because of nonlinearity originating from ͑i͒ SSRM signal to resistivity conversion 30 and ͑ii͒ that resistivity itself is a product of carrier concentration and mobility. In addition, the SSRM signal depends on the contact resistance in the tip-sample circuit and is not identical in different ͑even sequential͒ measurements because of, e.g., tip degradation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SSRM resistance is extracted from the measured current by applying a dc bias between a Ti-Pt-covered silicon tip and the sample so that the signal is proportional to the sample resistivity. 13 SCM was carried out using a similar circuit in dC / dV mode. 13 Positron annihilation spectroscopy ͑PAS͒ was used to monitor open volume defects in the samples, specifically the behavior of zinc vacancies ͑V Zn ͒, the dominant irradiationinduced defect detected by PAS in ZnO at room temperature.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 SCM was carried out using a similar circuit in dC / dV mode. 13 Positron annihilation spectroscopy ͑PAS͒ was used to monitor open volume defects in the samples, specifically the behavior of zinc vacancies ͑V Zn ͒, the dominant irradiationinduced defect detected by PAS in ZnO at room temperature. 14 PAS is based on positron trapping at neutral and negative vacancy defects, which modifies the annihilation characteristics including the Doppler broadening of the 511 keV annihilation line.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The samples were also characterized using a Digital Instruments Nanoscope IIIa Multimode Atomic Force Microscope (AFM) using a C-AFM electrical extension named "Resiscope", which allows one to get an electrical map in parallel to the topography when measuring the current flowing through the tip [42,43]. For these measurements a bias voltage is applied between the tip and the back side of the sample.…”
Section: Nanoscale Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%