2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2011.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of tension–compression asymmetry of NiTi using circular bulge testing of thin plates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The tension-compression asymmetry is observable not only on the critical stress to trigger the martensitic transformation, but also on the stress-temperature slopes of the phase diagram and on the magnitude of transformation strains [4]. The behavior of processed SMAs also shows a strong anisotropic behavior [5,6]. Like other metals, the texture of the material and the presence of internal stresses are found to be responsible for such anisotropy.…”
Section: Phase Transformation Of Anisotropic Shape Memory Alloys: Thementioning
confidence: 94%
“…The tension-compression asymmetry is observable not only on the critical stress to trigger the martensitic transformation, but also on the stress-temperature slopes of the phase diagram and on the magnitude of transformation strains [4]. The behavior of processed SMAs also shows a strong anisotropic behavior [5,6]. Like other metals, the texture of the material and the presence of internal stresses are found to be responsible for such anisotropy.…”
Section: Phase Transformation Of Anisotropic Shape Memory Alloys: Thementioning
confidence: 94%
“…In order to design a stent that will interact with the prostate tissues with proper extended and contracted diameters, the behaviour of NiTi wire and tube was investigating under pure bending. NiTi materials present tensioncompression asymmetry [5,6], which makes bending behaviour difficult to predict. A specific *Corresponding author: gabriel.antherieu@imag.fr apparatus has been designed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transformation functionsΦ F andΦ R are the particular terms in the transformation criteria that consider the shape of the bounding surfaces in the six-dimensional stress hyperspace; here a modified Prager function is chosen that accounts for tension-compression asymmetry but not anisotropy (Bouvet et al, 2004;Grolleau et al, 2011). The following formulation closely follows Patoor et al (1996), Peultier et al (2008), and Chemisky et al (2011).…”
Section: Fully Recoverable Martensitic Transformationmentioning
confidence: 99%