2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of sustainable urban development based on a hybrid decision-making approach: Group fuzzy BWM, AHP, and TOPSIS–GIS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the utilization of MCDSSs, the suitability criteria were weighed by AHP and the determined weights assessed via expert choice software. In another study, Foroozesh, Monavari, Salmanmahiny, Robati, and Rahimi (2022) developed a practical framework consisting of GIS and MCDA to assess the development sustainability of Karaj, a city in the west of Tehran, Iran. In this research, the influencing factors on sustainable urban development took into consideration 7 criteria and 24 sub‐criteria—screened and selected based on the literature—and interviews with experts using the Delphi method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the utilization of MCDSSs, the suitability criteria were weighed by AHP and the determined weights assessed via expert choice software. In another study, Foroozesh, Monavari, Salmanmahiny, Robati, and Rahimi (2022) developed a practical framework consisting of GIS and MCDA to assess the development sustainability of Karaj, a city in the west of Tehran, Iran. In this research, the influencing factors on sustainable urban development took into consideration 7 criteria and 24 sub‐criteria—screened and selected based on the literature—and interviews with experts using the Delphi method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the studies using MCDA, the widely employed methods include the Best-Worst Method (BWM) [43][44][45], Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) [46][47][48], Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluation (PROMETHEE)-I and II [49][50][51][52], VlseKriterijumska Optimizacija I KOmpromisno Resenje (VIKOR) [53][54][55], Elimination and Choice Translating Reality (ELECTRE) [56,57], Decision making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) [58][59][60], and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) [61][62][63]. Further, the studies that deal with qualitative attributes utilize fuzzified MCDA approaches such as Fuzzy AHP [64,65], Fuzzy TOPSIS [66,67], and many others.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As far as the author of the study [19] is aware, Priorities have never been evaluated using decision-making process based on quantitative comparisons of these methodologies.…”
Section: Literature Review and Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%