2016
DOI: 10.1080/15438627.2016.1191490
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of skeletal age on the basis of DXA-derived hand scans in elite youth soccer

Abstract: Physical performance is highly dependent on maturity. Therefore, consideration of maturity is recommended in the talent identification process. To date, skeletal age (SA) is assessed using X-ray scans. However, X-rays are associated with a 10-fold higher radiation compared to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The aim of the study was to validate SA assessments in male soccer players with the DXA technique. Paired X-ray and DXA scans of the left hand of 63 Swiss U-15 national soccer players were performed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These statistically similar results align to the one found by Malina et al [10] Romann&Fuchslocher [11] and Sherar et al [12] which advocates how much the concentration of the athletes in a determined category of maturation(late, on timeand early) is an important aspect to practical application by coaches in the processes of drafting and development inside the sports category.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…These statistically similar results align to the one found by Malina et al [10] Romann&Fuchslocher [11] and Sherar et al [12] which advocates how much the concentration of the athletes in a determined category of maturation(late, on timeand early) is an important aspect to practical application by coaches in the processes of drafting and development inside the sports category.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The inter-rater reliability to assess bone age from DXA hand scans was rated as "excellent" between an expert and a newly trained researcher, as shown by an ICC of 0.996 for BMS and 0.994 for bone age. The reproducibility between researchers to estimate bone age was slightly higher than in other studies which had ICCs of 0.99 (Heppe et al 2012) and 0.93 and 0.95 at two different time points (Romann and Fuchslocher 2016). Intra-rater reliability was similarly excellent, above 0.97, and comparable to that of experienced raters with an ICC !…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Intra-rater reliability was similarly excellent, above 0.97, and comparable to that of experienced raters with an ICC ! 0.98 in other studies of DXA derived skeletal age (Heppe et al 2012;Romann and Fuchslocher 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent studies have also been validating ultrasound and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) to estimate skeletal age. These alternatives expose the subject to lower and non-ionizing radiation compared to X-ray radiography 39,40 ; however, those alternatives require sophisticated equipment at a high cost, which render its use less attractive in epidemiological studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%