2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.coal.2008.09.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of shrinkage–swelling influences in coal seams using rank-dependent physical coal properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Coal with a higher Poisson's ratio results in a higher production rate with the C&B and G&C models but lower values in the S&D and P&M models (Cui and Bustin, 2005;Gu and Chalaturnyk, 2005;Zulkarnain, 2005). Thus, our results show significant influence of Poisson's ratio, which somewhat contradicts finding by Balan and Gumrah (2009) who stateed that Poisson's ratio does not affect CBM recovery.…”
Section: Effect Of Young's Modulus and Poisson's Ratiocontrasting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Coal with a higher Poisson's ratio results in a higher production rate with the C&B and G&C models but lower values in the S&D and P&M models (Cui and Bustin, 2005;Gu and Chalaturnyk, 2005;Zulkarnain, 2005). Thus, our results show significant influence of Poisson's ratio, which somewhat contradicts finding by Balan and Gumrah (2009) who stateed that Poisson's ratio does not affect CBM recovery.…”
Section: Effect Of Young's Modulus and Poisson's Ratiocontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…The influences of E and ν are investigated in this section. The E and ν values for coal with low, medium and high deformability are listed in Table 3 (Balan and Gumrah, 2009). The methane and gas production rates for three different Young's moduli are compared in Fig.…”
Section: Effect Of Young's Modulus and Poisson's Ratiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GEM software has been proven in numerous production studies around the world and is one of the commonly used simulators for unconventional gas reservoirs (ex. Gu and Chalaturnyk, 2005;Wong et al, 2007;Gentzis and Bolen, 2008;Maricic et al, 2008;Balan and Gumrah, 2009;Mora and Wattattenbarger, 2009). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Injection of pure CO 2 into coal seams usually has a negative effect—coal swelling‐induced permeability decreasing, due to the greater adsorption affinity of CO 2 to coal than of CH 4 . Related studies show that CO 2 injections will cause a reduction in coal permeability by nearly two orders of magnitude, especially near the injection well .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 Injection of pure CO 2 into coal seams usually has a negative effect-coal swelling-induced permeability decreasing, due to the greater adsorption affinity of CO 2 to coal than of CH 4 . 5,[25][26][27] Related studies show that CO 2 injections will cause a reduction in coal permeability by nearly two orders of magnitude, especially near the injection well. 9,12,15 Even if the CO 2 -ECBM is completed, the decreased coal permeability cannot rebound to initial values, thus results in the deterioration of well injectivity.Another gas injected into coal seams is N 2 , which has a different mechanism of ECBM recovery than CO 2 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%