Advances in Water Resources and Hydraulic Engineering 2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-89465-0_27
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Safety on Evacuating Route During Underground Flooding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chen et al [19] described that the thresholds were chosen based on experimental values. Ishigaki et al [28] suggested that inundation depth = 0.3 m is the safety limit for elders to walk through. Hereafter this study evaluates the model performance using a threshold = 0.3 m. When comparing the results in Pingtung (Figure 6), the SPMD (0.33) has better fit indicators than the SPME (0.16) (Figure 11).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chen et al [19] described that the thresholds were chosen based on experimental values. Ishigaki et al [28] suggested that inundation depth = 0.3 m is the safety limit for elders to walk through. Hereafter this study evaluates the model performance using a threshold = 0.3 m. When comparing the results in Pingtung (Figure 6), the SPMD (0.33) has better fit indicators than the SPME (0.16) (Figure 11).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the degree of flood hazard (Xia et al 2011), including: (1) formulae based on mechanical analysis and calibrated using laboratory experiments with models and/or real human subjects (Foster and Cox 1973;Abt et al 1989;Takahashi et al 1992;Karvonen et al 2000;Yee 2003;Jonkman and Penning-Rowsell 2008a, b;Russo et al 2013), and (2) formulae based on empirical or quasi-theoretical studies (Keller and Mitsch 1993;Lind et al 2004;Penning-Rowsell et al 2005a;Ramsbottom et al 2003Ramsbottom et al , 2006Ishigaki et al 2005Ishigaki et al , 2009). However, flood hazard assessments methods based only on laboratory experiments with models and/or real human subjects are usually too dependent on the physical characteristics of the model or the human subject, and cognitive characteristics of the tested human subjects, whereas flood hazard assessment methods based on empirical or quasi-theoretical work often excessively over-simplify the anatomy of human body and the hydraulic characteristics of the flow (Jonkman and Penning-Rowsell 2008a, b;Xia et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assessment of safety on evacuating routes has been carried out by using calculated water depth and flow velocity of inundation by 2D shallow flow model, and the relation between the specific force and evacuation speed on the basis of evacuation tests (Ishigaki et al 2008b). …”
Section: Safety Analysis Of Evacuating Routesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relation between M 0 values and evacuation speed doi: 10.2166/wst.2010.455 was discussed on the basis of experimental data obtained by evacuation tests and the assessment of safety on evacuating routes during underground flooding (Ishigaki et al 2008b). As the previous studies focused mainly on the evacuation of males around 22 years old, the evacuation of aged persons are discussed in this paper by using further experimental data and numerical simulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%