2019
DOI: 10.18821/0016-9900-2017-96-3-206-211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Risks to the Health of the Population From Air Borne Contaminants in Certain Areas of Moscow (Based on the Findings of on-Going Socio-Hygienic Monitoring)

Abstract: There was executed the assessment of carcinogen and non-carcinogen risks for population health in some areas of the western, south-western and south-eastern administrative districts of Moscow under the exposure to air borne contaminants whose levels are kept track by various government agencies as part of the socio-hygienic monitoring. The value of chronic non-carcinogenic risks to the health of the population as measured according to the danger index for the combined impact of average annual concentrations of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Developed and tested a multidimensional generic questionnaire study of health-related quality of life, consisting of 15 scales [10] used for comparative analysis of the severity of the main types of functioning (social-hygienic, physical, social adaptation, recreational activities, emotional state) of urban residents. The assessment of health and specific environmentally related clinical and functional abnormalities affecting the client satisfaction with the health-related quality of life in their respective habitat conditions [8,11,22]. The performed integrated ecologicalhygienic and medico-social analysis using risk assessment methodology provided for classification of the urban residents (factor analysis) by risk groups (well-being, relative and absolute risk).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Developed and tested a multidimensional generic questionnaire study of health-related quality of life, consisting of 15 scales [10] used for comparative analysis of the severity of the main types of functioning (social-hygienic, physical, social adaptation, recreational activities, emotional state) of urban residents. The assessment of health and specific environmentally related clinical and functional abnormalities affecting the client satisfaction with the health-related quality of life in their respective habitat conditions [8,11,22]. The performed integrated ecologicalhygienic and medico-social analysis using risk assessment methodology provided for classification of the urban residents (factor analysis) by risk groups (well-being, relative and absolute risk).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modern risk-oriented methodology of the feasibility of distribution of population by groups, objects and territories of risk [8,9,17]. Need to be methodical and scientific explanation of complex medico-social, hygiene and ecological regional studies with the use of integrated quantitative and qualitative indicators of health and health-related quality of life of the population of administrative territories with high anthropogenic load, which can serve as criteria of effectiveness of implementation of regional environmental programs [1,14,16,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Andreeva, A.V. Ivanenko with colleagues [26,27], several vital managerial actions were taken in Moscow due to the improved system of social-hygienic monitoring and constant and systemic communications with decision-makers about results obtained by assessing health risks for people living in a megacity and exposed to harmful environmental factors. These actions resulted in positive medical and demographic trends, obvious stabilization or even a decrease in population incidence authentically associated with exposure to harmful environmental factors and a decline in frequency of severe diseases (perinatal pathology and congenital malformations, etc.).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%