Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2005.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of risk of attack to safflower by Ceratapion basicorne (Coleoptera: Apionidae), a prospective biological control agent of Centaurea solstitialis (Asteraceae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Stoeva et al (2008) conducted a choice experiment in which test plants touched an infested host plant, so the mites could disperse by crawling. However, their results did not differ greatly from those of a parallel Medal et al 1999;Smith et al 2006;Bredow et al 2007). Such field experiments have rarely been done with eriophyoid mites before obtaining approval for release (McClay et al 1999;Littlefield and Sobhian 2000;Fig.…”
Section: Host Specificity Testing Of Eriophyoid Mitesmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Stoeva et al (2008) conducted a choice experiment in which test plants touched an infested host plant, so the mites could disperse by crawling. However, their results did not differ greatly from those of a parallel Medal et al 1999;Smith et al 2006;Bredow et al 2007). Such field experiments have rarely been done with eriophyoid mites before obtaining approval for release (McClay et al 1999;Littlefield and Sobhian 2000;Fig.…”
Section: Host Specificity Testing Of Eriophyoid Mitesmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Recent studies suggest C. basicorne is more host specific than suggested initially by Clement et al () in Italy. For example, during a 3‐year field study in Eastern Turkey, Smith et al () assessed the risk of C. basicorne to safflower and found that no safflower plants were attacked despite 48–100% attack rates on yellow starthistle. In no choice laboratory tests, Smith () found the highest rates of successful larval development of C. basicorne on yellow starthistle and cornflower, although some development occurred on closely related weeds such as Centaurea melitensis (Napa starthistle), Cnicus benedictus (blessed thistle) and Crupina vulgaris (common crupina ), as well as on safflower.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In central and southern Turkey, Uygur () reported a mean area covered by YST of 22.6% (range 3–30%) with a C. basicorne infestation rate of 18.4%. Rosenthal et al () reported 50–97% infestation and Smith et al () reported 48–100% infestation in field garden studies, whereas Balciunas and Korotyaev () found an average 58% infestation across 20 sites. Uygur et al () reported that at least 50% of the root crown area was damaged in 63% of YST plants in southern Turkey.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Within their native ranges, knapweeds are readily fed upon by many herbivores. Feeding damage of the weevil, Ceratapion basicome, on the roots and foliage of Centaurea solstitialis and C. cyanus has been documented in wild populations within Turkey (Smith et al, 2006). The root weevil, Cyphocleonus achates, attacks the root crown of both Centaurea maculosa and C. diffusa causing an overall decrease in knapweed fitness as well as an increase in plant mortality (Corn et al, 2006).…”
Section: Centaurea Biology Chemistry and Herbivoresmentioning
confidence: 99%