The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2011
DOI: 10.1530/eje-11-0286
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of primary cancers in GH-treated adult hypopituitary patients: an analysis from the Hypopituitary Control and Complications Study

Abstract: ObjectiveGH and IGFs have mitogenic properties, causing speculation that GH treatment could increase risk of malignancy. While studies in GH-treated childhood cancer survivors have suggested a slight increase in second neoplasms, studies in GH-treated adults have been equivocal.DesignIncidence of de novo and second cancers was evaluated in 6840 GH-treated and 940 non GH-treated adult patients in the Hypopituitary Control and Complications Study pharmacoepidemiological database.MethodsEvident cancer cases were … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
47
3
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
6
47
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite extended person years of follow-up, the average time of follow-up in HypoCCS remains relatively short (mean 4.8 years for all GH-treated patients). However, the SIRs for both GH-treated and untreated patients have reduced with increased follow-up since the previous analysis, from 0.88 (0.74-1.04) previously (14) to 0.82 (0.71-0.93) for GH-treated patients in this report. Cancer/tumour induction time was not used to adjust our analyses.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 52%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Despite extended person years of follow-up, the average time of follow-up in HypoCCS remains relatively short (mean 4.8 years for all GH-treated patients). However, the SIRs for both GH-treated and untreated patients have reduced with increased follow-up since the previous analysis, from 0.88 (0.74-1.04) previously (14) to 0.82 (0.71-0.93) for GH-treated patients in this report. Cancer/tumour induction time was not used to adjust our analyses.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…Additionally, the SIR for primary cancers in US patients with CO GHD was significantly elevated. As reported previously from the HypoCCS database it is reasonable to conclude that a proportion of these patients have a higher risk of second neoplasms associated with survival of childhood neoplastic disease (14,34). The updated analysis presented here included 28 patients with history of malignancy prior to HypoCCS entry, including 12 with history of intracranial tumours or leukaemia and mean age at second cancer onset of 32.6 years, and ten of whom had CO GHD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[25]. rates of general population, standardized by country, gender, and age [30]. Bunderen et al played a review to discuss the long-term efficacy and safety of GH treatment in AGHD patients with emphasis on morbidity [31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%