2012
DOI: 10.1590/s0004-28032012000100004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of portal venous index as a non-invasive method for diagnosing liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C

Abstract: -Context -Hepatitis C is an important cause of chronic liver disease worldwide. The grading of hepatic fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C is important for better clinical management. However, until now, liver biopsy is the only test accepted for this purpose, despite their contraindications and complications. New methods for non-invasive assessment of hepatic fibrosis are under investigation. One proposal is the Doppler ultrasound, as a non-invasive, widely available and inexpensive. Objective -To compare Doppler… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
2
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…21 This last finding is probably due to the great interpersonal variability of these indices. 23 The PVPI cut-off point for this purpose was higher in the present study, with higher sensitivity and specificity. 22 The data of hepatic artery pulsatility index (Table 1) showed values significantly higher in the group with hepatic fibrosis (F2/F3/F4), with a linear association between data obtained through elastography, with a mean of 1.22 in the group with significant hepatic fibrosis.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 42%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…21 This last finding is probably due to the great interpersonal variability of these indices. 23 The PVPI cut-off point for this purpose was higher in the present study, with higher sensitivity and specificity. 22 The data of hepatic artery pulsatility index (Table 1) showed values significantly higher in the group with hepatic fibrosis (F2/F3/F4), with a linear association between data obtained through elastography, with a mean of 1.22 in the group with significant hepatic fibrosis.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 42%
“…The PVPI of patients with chronic hepatitis C presented significantly lower values when compared with a healthy control group, independent of the degree of fibrosis (mean PVPI, 0.23 ± 0.009; P < 0.0001), and a cut-off point of PVPI = 0.28 was determined for the detection of hepatic fibrosis ≥ F2, which, compared with the biopsy, had a sensitivity of 73.5% and a specificity of 71.1%. 23 The PVPI cut-off point for this purpose was higher in the present study, with higher sensitivity and specificity. Data regarding the use of portal vein resistance index for non-invasive assessment of liver fibrosis were not found in the literature.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 42%
“…Early investigations have focused on the diameter, flow, waveform, and undulation of the three major vessels (the portal vein, hepatic vein and the hepatic artery). Few studies however, focus on distinguishing significant fibrosis (METAVIR stage CF2) from those with less fibrosis (F0-F1), important in determining time to initiate antiviral therapy (Table 1) [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Ultrasound-based Measures Of Fibrosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A veia porta foi avaliada hemodinamicamente pelo cálculo do índice de pulsatilidade venosa portal (IVP). Este parâmetro tem como principal vantagem não depender da angulação para obtenção de velocidades reais, o que o torna mais reprodutível (Rocha et al, 2012). O fato de o paciente interromper os movimentos respiratórios durante o exame da veia porta previne as flutuações da onda devido a respiração o que proporciona medidas mais acuradas (Karasin et al, 2014).…”
Section: -Discussãounclassified
“…Achados semelhantes foram descritos também em publicações que abordaram outras doenças hepáticas crônicas. Um estudo que avaliou a influência da fibrose sobre o IVP em pacientes portadores de hepatite C encontrou média de 0,33 ± 0,07 para o grupo controle e 0,23 ± 0,09 para o grupo com esteatose (Rocha et al, 2012). Em outra publicação que avaliou pacientes com hipertensão portal foram encontradas 0,39 ± 0,10 e 0,23 ± 0,08 com médias para o grupo controle e grupo com esteatose, respectivamente .…”
Section: -Discussãounclassified