2012
DOI: 10.17660/actahortic.2012.959.17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Pollen Viability in Guava Genotypes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pollen grains from the anthers of pea plants tested in vitro were excised and stained on glass slides, each with a drop of 1% carmine (Coser et al, 2012). They were covered with coverslips, and after a couple of minutes observed under the microscope (10 x lens).…”
Section: Pollen Viabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pollen grains from the anthers of pea plants tested in vitro were excised and stained on glass slides, each with a drop of 1% carmine (Coser et al, 2012). They were covered with coverslips, and after a couple of minutes observed under the microscope (10 x lens).…”
Section: Pollen Viabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 22 guava tree genotypes exhibited large amount of viable pollen, with 16 of them presenting mean pollen viability of more than 84%, a value considered high in this study (Table 1); an overall mean of 93.46% was obtained in the three harvests. In wild guava trees, pollen viability values between 73% and 99% have been reported using Lugol and Acetic Orcein (Coser, et al, 2012a). However, the present study is the first account of this feature being tracked across the first harvests of an orchard in establishment process; this way, important information is provided for the crop, as crosspollination has been related as an important factor regarding productivity, with production losses occurring due to selffertilization (Alves and Freitas, 2007).…”
Section: Pollen Viabilitymentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The results obtained in the present study are in agreement with that statement, given that our pollen germination data indicated a significantly lower rate than that observed when using staining materials. Similarly, when analysing pollen viability for guava genotypes (Psidium guajava), in which estimations had been made for in vitro pollen germination and staining method germination (Lugol's solution and acetic orcein), Coser et al (2012) observed that the results obtained through the use of staining materials were better than those when using in vitro methods. These authors state that the use of staining materials, while extremely attractive due to their simplicity and ease of use, overestimate guava pollen viability when compared with results obtained in vitro.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%