2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.apr.2020.08.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of PM2.5 population exposure of a community using sensor-based air monitoring instruments and similar time-activity groups

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the results of the time activity survey conducted in this study, participants spent approximately 8% of their daily time outdoors. Time activity studies previously conducted by Klepis et al and Yang et al indicated that people spent 5% of their time outdoors, which is approximately 1 to 2 h per day [39][40][41]. As the time spent outdoors was relatively short, the effectiveness of the outdoor smoking ban has been widely debated [42,43].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the results of the time activity survey conducted in this study, participants spent approximately 8% of their daily time outdoors. Time activity studies previously conducted by Klepis et al and Yang et al indicated that people spent 5% of their time outdoors, which is approximately 1 to 2 h per day [39][40][41]. As the time spent outdoors was relatively short, the effectiveness of the outdoor smoking ban has been widely debated [42,43].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total daily exposure of a population with concentration, time, and the number of people may be generated by estimated concentrations and dynamic population data using smartphones within a standard grid. Whether individuals stay indoors or outdoors at that time should be evaluated [91]. The use of personal information may be a problem for phone owners, telecom operators, researchers, and the public.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The deterioration of qualitative and quantitative characteristics of the surface layer of air leads to negative consequences [1] not only for the biosphere as a whole, but also to increase the impact on public health [2] and the increasing number of diseases and allergies. The reverse effects observed by scientists around the world related to the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic are also possible [3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%