2018
DOI: 10.1007/s13201-018-0885-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of physicochemical and bacteriological parameters in surface water of Padma River, Bangladesh

Abstract: In the present study, surface water samples were collected during three seasons (summer, monsoon and winter) from four different study sites (T-dam, Padma Garden, I-dam and Talaimari point) of Padma River at Rajshahi, Bangladesh, and various physicochemical and bacterial parameters were analyzed based on standard methods. Significant differences (p < 0.05) in physicochemical parameters were observed among the seasons and sites except for water temperature. However, except for fecal coliform, other bacterial pa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
16
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
5
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In pond water, the lowest value of TCC was counted as 3.4 × 10 5 cfu/100ml (Pond-3) and the highest was 4.8 × 10 13 cfu/100ml (Pond-4) where the mean value was 2.5 × 10 6 cfu/100ml (Figure 10). In a previous study, the average values of TCC was 4.5 × 10 18 cfu/100ml in different surface water of Dhaka, Bangladesh [55] and many other studies also support the similar result regarding TCC [52] [56] [57]. In jar water, the highest number of coliform was 90 (Jar-6), lowest was 6 (Jar-2) and the average was about 33 (Figure 11).…”
Section: Total Coliform Countsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…In pond water, the lowest value of TCC was counted as 3.4 × 10 5 cfu/100ml (Pond-3) and the highest was 4.8 × 10 13 cfu/100ml (Pond-4) where the mean value was 2.5 × 10 6 cfu/100ml (Figure 10). In a previous study, the average values of TCC was 4.5 × 10 18 cfu/100ml in different surface water of Dhaka, Bangladesh [55] and many other studies also support the similar result regarding TCC [52] [56] [57]. In jar water, the highest number of coliform was 90 (Jar-6), lowest was 6 (Jar-2) and the average was about 33 (Figure 11).…”
Section: Total Coliform Countsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…There was a significant difference between DO values for the mid-waters and the shore samples (p = 0.002) and between the tributaries and the dam (p = 4.48E-05). [29]. The BOD of the samples was between 176.00±15.62 -523.33±13.61 mg/L (Figure 9).…”
Section: Figure 7 Hardness Of the Water Samplesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Environmental factors may be one of the reasons that explain the morphological differences observed in this study. Indeed, previous studies reported a difference in water quality parameters in these four rivers especially water temperature and the concentrations of dissolved oxygen (Haque et al 2019;Islam et al 2015;Islam et al 2014;Uddin et al 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%