Assessment of Pharmacy Information System Performance in Selected Hospitals in Isfahan City During 2011

Abstract

Background:In supporting a therapeutic approach and medication therapy management, pharmacy information system acts as one of the central pillars of information system. This ensures that medication therapy is being supported and evaluated with an optimal level of safety and quality similar to other treatments and services. Objectives: This research aims to evaluate the performance of pharmacy information system in three types of teaching, private and social affiliated hospitals. Patients and Methods:The present study is an applied, descriptive and analytical study which was conducted on the pharmacy information system in use in the selected hospitals. The research population included all the users of pharmacy information systems in the selected hospitals. The research sample is the same as the research population. Researchers collected data using a self-designed checklist developed following the guidelines of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, Australia pharmaceutical Society and Therapeutic guidelines of the Drug Commission of the German Medical Association. The checklist validity was assessed by research supervisors and pharmacy information system pharmacists and users. To collect data besides observation, the questionnaires were distributed among pharmacy information system pharmacists and users. Finally, the analysis of the data was performed using the SPSS software. Results: Pharmacy information system was found to be semi-automated in 16 hospitals and automated in 3 ones. Regarding the standards in the guidelines issued by the Society of Pharmacists, the highest rank in observing the input standards belonged to the Social Services associated hospitals with a mean score of 32.75. While teaching hospitals gained the highest score both in processing standards with a mean score of 29.15 and output standards with a mean score of 43.95, and the private hospitals had the lowest mean scores of 23.32, 17.78, 24.25 in input, process and output standards respectively. Conclusions: Based on the findings, the studied hospitals had minimal compliance with the input, output and processing standards related to the pharmacy information system. It is suggested that the establishment of a team composed of operational managers, computer fields experts, health information managers, pharmacists as well as physicians may contribute to the promotion of the capabilities of pharmacy information system to be able to focus on health care practitioners' and users' requirements.

Evaluation methods used on health information systems (HISs) in Iran and the effects of HISs on Iranian healthcare: A systematic review

“…Number of studies Survey 27 Interview [44][45][46][47][48][49][50] 7 Observation [51][52][53] 3 Interview & observation [54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63] 10 Survey & observation [64] 1 Heuristic evaluation [65,66] 2 Review the records [67,68] 2 Interview, observation, reviewing records [69] 1 Evaluation tools Questionnaire [17, 18, 20-25, 27-44, 46, 49] 28 Checklist [26, 45, 47, 50, 52-56, 59, 60, 62, 63, 65, 68] 15 Checklist & questionnaire [19,51,57,58,61,64,69] 7 Data collection form [66,67] 2 Audio recorder [48] 1…”

A Comparative Analysis of Public Hospital Pharmacy Systems in Norway and Pakistan: A Pilot Implementation of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists’ (ASHP) Guidelines

“…Some of these recommendations might be appropriate to other healthcare settings or help in assessing the extent and quality of pharmacy services. Several researchers have used these standards to evaluate hospital pharmacy practices in Iran, Saudi Arabia, Lebanon, and Spain, respectively [26][27][28][29]. The questionnaire used in this study was modified from the original ASPH standards.…”